12013805561
publisher@imedpub.com
Submit a Manuscript
Navbar
Home
About
Journals
Aquaculture & Veterinary Science
Chemistry & Chemical Sciences
Clinical Science
Engineering
Genetics & Molecular Biology
General Science
Health Care & Nursing
Immunology & Microbiology
Materials Science
Mathematics & Physics
Medical Sciences
Oncology & Cancer Science
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Neurology & Psychiatry
Articles
Editors
Editorial board responsibilities
Editorial workflow
Code of conduct
Authors
Why with us?
Publication models
Guidelines for authors
Article processing charges
Reviewers
Conducting the review
Code of conduct
Our Services
Advertisements
Associations
Membership
Reprints
Contact Us
Covid-19 Journal Articles Issues
44 7723872338
Code of Conduct
The Editor(s)-in-Chief should declare any financial, personal or other relationships that might constitute a conflict of interest with the Editorship of the journal.
The Editor(s)-in-Chief should ensure that all articles accepted for publication have been assessed by an editor.
The Editor(s)-in-Chief should not make decisions regarding manuscripts about which they may have a conflict of interest. In such instances, a senior member of the Editorial Board should be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer-review and making decisions regarding acceptance or rejection.
Although the Editor(s)-in-Chief may publish in their own journal, they should ensure the majority of publications come from other authors. A senior member of the Editorial Board should be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer-review and making decisions regarding acceptance or rejection of any manuscript submitted and/or co-authored by the Editor(s)-in-Chief.
The Editor(s)-in-Chief should ensure Editorial Board members are not involved with the peer-review or decision-making process of any manuscript where they have a conflict of interest.
Editor(s)-in-Chief should provide a professional service to authors. Correspondence should be handled in a timely and respectful manner, and efficient and thorough peer-review carried out. Systems should be in place to ensure editorial staff absences do not result in a reduced service to authors.
Editor(s)-in-Chief who operates a closed peer-review system for the journal should maintain the anonymity of peer reviewers.