'The Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Coping Strategies among Patients with Cancer in Gaza Strip

Al Jadili M1 and Thabet AA2*

1MPH-Ministry of Health, Gaza Strip, Palestine

2Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Al Quds University, Gaza Strip, Palestine

*Corresponding Author:
Thabet AA
Emeritus Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Al Quds University, Gaza Strip, Palestine
Tel: 014377771978
E-mail: abdelazizt@hotmail.com

Received date: March 22, 2017; Accepted date: April 19, 2017; Published date: April 24, 2017

Citation: Al Jadili M, Thabet AA. The Relationship Between Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Coping Strategies among Patients with Cancer in Gaza Strip. J Nurs Health Stud 2017, 2:1. doi: 10.21767/2574-2825.100011

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Nursing and Health Studies

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to examine the mental health status of the patients with cancer and the coping strategies that adopted by them in front of stressful situations.

Method: The sample consisted of 358 patients with cancer in the oncology clinic at Shifa Hospital in Gaza Strip. Participants were interviewed individually by questionnaire include socioeconomic questionnaire, PTSD scale, and Ways of coping Scale.

Results: The study showed that 42.5% of patients had PTSD, 47% had re-experiencing of PTSD, 40.5% had hyperarousal, and 40.1% had avoidance symptoms. The group of 40 years and less were significantly higher in reexperiences than 71 years and above among the study sample.

The results showed that affiliation at the highest rank (81.6%), followed by reinterpretation (75.5%), self-control coping strategy (75.3%), problem solving (72.3%), wish and avoidance thinking was (69.0%), trouble and escape was (61.8%), accountability coping strategy was (53.0%) among the study sample of patients with cancer. The result showed that there were no significant differences in sex of patients and wish and avoidance thinking, problem solving, reinterpretation, affiliation, accountability, and self-control. However, there were significant differences in trouble and escape in favor of male patients. There was positive significant correlation between wish and avoidance thinking and re-experience of PTSD. In addition, there were positive significant correlation between accountability and PTSD, re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyper-arousal of PTSD. In addition, there were positive significant correlation between Trouble and escape and PTSD, re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyper-arousal of PTSD. While; there were negative significant correlation between problem solving and PTSD, re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyperarousal of PTSD. In addition, there were negative significant correlation between re-interpretation and PTSD, re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyperarousal of PTSD. In addition, there were negative significant correlation between affiliation and PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyperarousal of PTSD. In addition, there were negative significant correlation between selfcontrol and PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyper-arousal of PTSD.

Clinical implications: Our findings highlight the need for therapeutic and educational programmes-including counseling for those patients with cancer and their families, support groups, and behavioural therapy for patients with P.T.S.D, and other psychiatric disorders. Also, new family therapy programmes must be established aimed at improving communications and interactions between family members, as well as teaching problemsolving skills to assist the family members in confronting the mental health problems associated with cancer.

Keywords

Cancer; Coping strategies; Gaza Strip; Patients; PTSD

Introduction

According to GLOBOCAN, cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with approximately 14 million new cases in 2012 [1]. Globally, cancer the number of new cases is expected to rise by about 70% over the next 2 decades. Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, and was responsible for 8.8 million deaths in 2015. Globally, nearly 1 in 6 deaths is due to cancer. Approximately 70% of deaths from cancer occur in low-and middle-income countries. Around one third of deaths from cancer are due to the 5- leading behavioral and dietary risks: high body mass index, low fruit and vegetable intake, lack of physical activity, tobacco use, and alcohol use [2].

In Jordan, the incidence of cancer in adolescents is 159 new cases per 100 000, of which 15% die within one year of diagnosis [3]. Cancer among the Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza is increasingly becoming a public health concern. It is the second most common cause of mortality. A total of 2189 new cases have been reported in the West Bank in 2013 (51% females, 49% males). Both in the West Bank and Gaza, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and lung cancer among men. In children, less than 15 years old, leukemia is the most common one. Cancer is diagnosed at late stages; at least 60% of cancer cases are diagnosed at Stage III or IV [4]. he psychological distress among cancer patients has been addressed consistently in an international context. The notable feature is that the findings of prevalence of psychological distress varied from one sample to another. Accordingly, the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition [5] modified and broadened its taxonomy of PTSD. This resulted in the inclusion of both the traumatic event itself, and the experience with the person involved in the event. Furthermore, increasing attention has focused upon assessing posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), which provides a continuous measure of posttraumatic stress reactions and risk of PTSD diagnosis in patients with cancer. Specifically, being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness or learning that one’s child [5] has such an illness became a qualifying stressful event. Moreover, Hobbie et al. reported that 21.0% of survivors at a long-term follow-up clinic had experienced PTSD since their diagnosis [6]. In a larger and higher-functioning sample of young adult survivors recruited from the community, 15.9% had PTSD since the end of their cancer treatment. Most (75.3%) met criteria of cluster B (reexperiencing), with nearly half (47.3%) meeting criteria of cluster D (arousal) (Rourke et al., 2002). Furthermore, Gold et al. in a study [7], had four aimed to determine the percentages of patients with PTSD and partial PTSD of 289 adult oncology patients found that 45% of the sample met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD and partial PTSD and were younger than those with no PTSD. Similarly, Hahn et al. in a study was to determine the prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptoms in a sample of 162 cancer survivors and to investigate their association with the impact of cancer [8], depressive symptoms, and social support showed that 29% of the sample had PTSD.

Individuals diagnosed with incurable cancer face a lifethreatening stressor that elicits various coping responses Lazarus and Folkman1 define coping as an individual’s constantly changing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage specific external and/or internal demands that are appraised as taxing or exceeding the resources to the person. Before implementing coping strategies, individuals cognitively appraise the nature of the stressor and their abilities and/or resources to cope with the threat [9]. Cancer is the most extensively researched as chronic illness. Cancer has been consistently implicated in the coping literature as necessitating a wide range of coping options to deal with shifting functional abilities, medical implications, treatment modalities, and psychosocial reactions. Compared with other people with serious illnesses, cancer patients have reported the highest percentage of religious coping responses [10]. Indeed, reporting a connection with a benevolent and loving God, religious involvement and spiritual practice have been associated with higher levels of hope [11,12], and ability to find meaning [13]. Although spirituality and/or religion can be an important resource to many people dealing with illness, sickness can also profoundly shake patients’ most fundamental, religious or spiritual (R/S) beliefs and practices leading to R/S struggle or distress, also referred to as negative religious coping (NRC). This struggle includes feeling abandoned by or angry at God, experiencing conflict with others regarding R/S beliefs or practices, or struggling with doubts regarding beliefs [14]. Furthermore, the cancer experience offers the opportunity to enter a reflexive relationship with God and one’s faith teachings, as well as providing a context in which to deepen family relationships, and a family’s spiritual understandings and experiences [15]. Recently, Dieperink et al. in a study examined in a single-center oncology unit in Odense [16], Denmark, 161 prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy were included in a randomized controlled trial from 2010 to 2012, showed that the most coping styles remained stable during the patient trajectory, but anxious preoccupation declined from before radiotherapy to follow up in both intervention and control groups. After six months the intervention group retained fighting spirit significantly compared with controls, but after three years this difference evened out. After three years, the intervention group had lower cognitive avoidance than the controls. Similarly, Ghiggia et al. in study of 21 patients with a previous diagnosis of nasopharyngeal cancer enrolled at the First Ear Nose and Troat (1stENT) Division [17], Department of Surgical Sciences, at the University of Turin, during their post-treatment observation period. Results evidenced that fighting spirit; cognitive avoidance and fatalism were used more than hopelessness/ helplessness or anxious preoccupation. The aims of this study were 1) to find the prevalence of PTSD among patients with cancer, 2) to explore the types of coping strategies used by patients diagnosed with cancer and 3) to elaborate the relationship between PTSD and coping strategies among patients with cancer in Gaza Strip.

Method

Participants

The study sample consisted of 400 patients selected randomly from a total of 6000 cancer cases attending cancer unit at Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza Strip. The final number agreed to participate were of 358 patients with cancer, 114 were males (32%) and 244 were females (68%). A respondent’s rate was 89.5%.

Measures

Interviewed directed questionnaire

This questionnaire was contains the following: Demographic and disease-related characteristics: As part of the semistructured interview, a scale was designed for this study in order to obtain the following information: age, marital and family monthly income, and diagnosis.

The Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist (DSM-IV)

The checklist contains 17 items adapted from the DSM-IV (APA, 2000) PTSD symptom criteria. Respondents are asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely) the extent to which symptoms troubled them in the previous month. A total score was provided, as well as subscales scores for re-experiences, arousal and avoidance PTSD symptoms. The characteristic symptoms of PTSD resulting from the exposure to extreme traumata included re-experiencing the traumatic event (criterion B), avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbing of general responsiveness (criterion C), and symptoms of increased arousal (criterion D). The full symptom picture must be present for more than one month and the disturbance must cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning [18]. We used the Arabic version of the scale which was widely used in the same area in the last decade (Thabet et al. 2008 and 2015). The reliability validity of the scale was calculated using alpha Cronbach which was (a=0.82).

The ways of coping questionnaire

The ways of coping questionnaire (WOC) was developed to assess different coping strategies with specific stressful encounters [19]. A revised version of 50-item WOC, which includes eight subscales, including: (a) Confronting coping, (b) Distancing strategies, (c) Self-control strategies, (d) Seeking social support, (e) Accepting responsibility, (f) Escapeavoidance, (g) Planful problem solving and (h) Positive reappraisal strategies, was used in this study [20]. The Cronbach’s alphas of the eight subscales were 0.70, 0.61, 0.70, 0.76, 0.66, 0.72, 0.68 and 0.79, respectively [20]. This scale had been validated in the Palestinian culture and showed high reliability [21].

Study Procedure

Data were collected during the period between in April-June 2008 at al Shifa Hospital. Questionnaires were filled by the researcher through the directed interview questionnaires, which had given to all attendants to the oncology clinic. Suitable environment was considered for all subjects in fulfilling the questionnaire.

Interviews done for 10 to 15 minutes, by the first author, three General Physicians working the cancer unite. Each patient was assessed for the vulnerability for interviewing with no embarrassments. In addition, all the subjects were exhibited the willingness for this study after they inform about the study and the goals of it. Furthermore, the place of the interview was comfortable and air conditioned, and the researcher made the interviews up on the fluency of the subjects with no previous preparation. We selected the first arriving subject to the clinic randomly while each other subject from the referral files in the oncology clinic (when each subject receives his file from the clerk).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0. Continuous variables were presented as M ± SD and categorical variables were expressed as frequencies (%). The PTSD, and coping strategies of the participants were exhibited using the mean values and SD. Spearman’s correlation coefficient tested the association between PTSD and coping scores of the participants. A twotailed p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of study population

The sample consisted of 358 patients with cancer, 114 were males (32%) and 244 were females (68%). patients with cancer from North Gaza were (24.9%), from Gaza (60.1%), and from middle area (15.1%). According to marital status 82.4% were married, 3.4% were single, 0.6% were divorced, and 13.7% were widowed. According to monthly income, 39.4% of patients had monthly income $ 250 and less, 35.5% had monthly income from $ 251-500, 22.3% of patients had monthly income from $ 501-750, and 2.8% had monthly income more than $751 (Table 1).

  N %
Gender
Males 114 31.8
Females 244 68.2
Age
40 and less 39 10.9
41-50 80 22.3
51-60 105 29.3
61-70 84 23.5
71 and above 50 14
Place of residence
North 89 24.9
Gaza 215 60.1
Middle 54 15.1
Marital status
Married 295 82.4
Single 12 3.4
Divorced 2 0.6
Widowed 49 13.7
Education level
Primary and less 96 26.8
Preparatory 99 27.7
Secondary 136 38
Diploma 0 0
University 27 7.5
Post graduate 0 0
Primary and less 96 26.8
Employment
Unemployed 64 17.9
Employee 39 10.9
Worker and private work 32 8.9
Retired 21 5.9
House wife 202 56.4
Unemployed 64 17.9
Retired 21 5.9
Monthly income
$ 250 and less 141 39.4
$ 251-500 127 35.5
$ 501-750 80 22.3
$ 751 and above 10 2.8

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the study sample (N=358).

Medical conditions of patients with cancer

As shown in Table 2, majority of cases were breast cancer (45.8%), 12.6% had colon cancer, and 22.9% diagnosed with other cancer (Table 2).

  N %
Type of cancer
Lung 21 5.9
Breast 164 45.8
Colon 45 12.6
Uterus 7 2
Ovary 3 0.8
Larynx 5 1.4
Liver 3 0.8
Thyroid gland 28 7.8
Other 82 22.9
Duration of illness
2-5 years 116 32.4
6-10 years 68 19
more than 10 years 35 9.8
Type of treatment
Hormonal 3 0.8
Chemotherapy 38 10.6
Radiation 3 0.8
Surgical 3 0.8
Mixed 311 86.9

Table 2: Medical conditions of patients with cancer.

PTSD symptoms

The following table shows that the symptoms of PTSD, where avoiding any thoughts or feelings about the event is the highest rank symptom (60.7%), followed by avoiding doing things or going into situations which remind you by the events (59.5%), and upset by some things which reminded you of the events at the third rank (57.0%) among the study sample of cancer patients (Table 3).

Symptoms Mean SD %
Avoiding any thoughts or feelings about the event. 2.43 1.27 60.7
Avoiding doing things or going into situations which remind you by the events. 2.38 1.28 59.5
Upset by some things which reminded you of the events. 2.28 1.23 57
Painful imagoes or memories of the events 2.23 1.17 55.7
Irritable or had outbursts of anger 1.93 1.08 48.2
Thoughts of the events were reoccurring 1.91 1.25 47.7
Jumble easily started 1.7 1.17 42.5
Difficulty enjoying things 1.6 1.17 40
Trouble falling asleep or staying sleep 1.58 1.14 39.5
Physically up set by reminders of the event 1.56 1.33 39
Distressing dreams of the events 1.54 1.08 38.5
On edge been easily distracted or hade to stay 1.46 1.23 36.5
Difficulty in concentration 1.43 1.13 35.7
Found it hard to imagine having along life span fulfilling your goals 1.41 1.24 35.2
Distant or cut off from other people 1.38 1.2 34.5
Unable to have sad or loving feeling 1.27 1.14 31.7
Found yourself unable to recall important parts of the event 0.74 1.11 18.5

Table 3: PTSD symptoms.

Means and Standard deviations of PTSD

The study showed that mean PTSD was 28.91 (SD=13.3), mean re-experiencing was 9.55 (SD=4.76), avoidance was 11.25 (SD=6.07), and hyperarousal mean was 8.11 (SD=4.80) (Figure 1).

nursing-health-studies-Means-standard-deviations-PTSD-subscales

Figure 1: Means and standard deviations of PTSD and subscales.

Post-hoc analysis using Scheffee statistical test was done. There were no significant age differences in PTSD, avoidance and hyperarousal according to age of the patients. However, patients at age group of 40 years and less were significantly reported more re-experiences symptoms than 71 years old and above a (F4/358)=3.51, p=0.008).

Using the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD, 42.5% of patients with cancer were diagnosed with PTSD (Table 4).

Variables Mean St. Dev. %
PTSD 28.91 14.36 42.5
Re-experiencing 9.55 4.76  
Avoidance 11.25 6.07  
Hyperarousal 8.11 4.8  

Table 4: Means and standard deviations of PTSD and subscales.

Sociodemographic variables and PTSD

In order to find the differences between sociodemographic variables and PTSD, independent t test for differences in mean of two groups and One Way ANOVA for more than two groups. The study showed that there were no significant differences in total PTSD re-experiences, avoidance, and hyperarousal according to sex of the patients sample (Table 5).

Variable Sex N Mean Std. Dev t-value p-value
PTSD Male 114 29.26 15.595 0.31 0.75
Female 244 28.75 13.772
Re-experiencing Male 114 9.36 5.199 0.49 0.62
Female 244 9.63 4.544
Avoidance Male 114 11.42 6.59 0.38 0.7
Female 244 11.16 5.823
Hyperarousal Male 114 8.46 5.164 0.95 0.34
Female 244 7.94 4.615

Table 5: Independent t-test comparing means of mental health problems according to sex.

PTSD according to type of cancer

In order to investigate the difference in PTSD according to type of tumor of the study sample (lung, breast, colon, uterus, ovary, larynx, liver, thyroid, other) the researcher demonstrate one-way ANOVA analysis (Table 6).

Variable Source of variance Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-value Sig.
Level
PTSD Between Groups 1055.523 8 131.94 0.635 0.748
Within Groups 72540.792 349 207.853
Total 73596.316 357  
Re-experiencing Between Groups 101.307 8 12.663 0.554 0.815
Within Groups 7977.288 349 22.858
Total 8078.595 357  
Avoidance Between Groups 252.207 8 31.526 0.853 0.557
Within Groups 12903.167 349 36.972
Total 13155.374 357  
Hyper arousal Between Groups 123.681 8 15.46 0.667 0.72
Within Groups 8087.85 349 23.174
Total 8211.531 357  

Table 6: One-way ANOVA comparing PTSD according to type of cancer.

Post Hoc test using Tukey test showed that there were no significant differences in PTSD (F (8/357)=0.63, p=0.74), and its dimensions re-experiences (F (8/357)=0.55, p=0.81), avoidance (F (8/357)=0.85, p=0.55), and hyper-arousal (F (8/357)=0.66, p=0.72) according to type of tumor of the study sample.

Types of coping strategies

The results found that affiliation at the highest rank (81.6%), followed by reinterpretation (75.5%), self-control coping strategy (75.3%), problem solving (72.3%), wish and avoidance thinking was (69.0%), trouble and escape was (61.8%), accountability coping strategy was (53.0%) among the study sample of patients with cancer (Figure 2 and Table 7).

nursing-health-studies-Means-standard-deviations-coping-strategies

Figure 2: Means and standard deviations of coping strategies.

Variables Mean SD %
Wish and avoidance thinking 19.33 2.45 69
Problem solving 17.37 3.76 72.3
Reinterpretation 27.19 5.09 75.5
Affiliation 16.33 2.81 81.6
Accountability 10.6 2.77 53
Self-control 21.09 3.34 75.3
Trouble and escape 12.36 2.51 61.8

Table 7: Means and standard deviations of coping strategies.

Sociodemographic variables and coping strategies

As showed in Table 6, the result showed that there were no significant differences in sex of patients and wish and avoidance thinking (t (358)=0.36, p<0.71), problem solving (t (358)=0.78, p<0.43), reinterpretation (t (358)=1.21, p<0.22), affiliation (t (358)=1.29, p<0.19), accountability (t(358)=1.26, p<0.20), and self-control (t (358)=0.71, p<0.47). However, there were significant differences in trouble and escape (t (358)=2.58, p<0.01) in favor of male cancer patients (Table 8).

Variable Sex N Mean Std. Dev t-value p-value
 Wish and avoidance thinking Male 114 19.26 2.63 0.36 0.71
Female 244 19.36 2.37
Problem solving Male 114 17.60 3.63 0.78 0.43
Female 244 17.27 3.83
Reinterpretation Male 114 26.71 4.89 1.21 0.22
Female 244 27.41 5.17
Affiliation Male 114 16.05 2.86 1.29 0.19
Female 244 16.46 2.78
Accountability Male 114 10.87 2.72 1.26 0.20
Female 244 10.47 2.78
Self-Control Male 114 20.91 3.27 0.71 0.47
Female 244 21.18 3.37
Trouble and Escape Male 114 12.85 2.52 2.58 0.01**
Female 244 12.13 2.47

Table 8: Independent t-test comparing means of coping strategies according to sex.

Correlation between coping strategies and mental health problems among the study sample

As shown in the following table, there were positive significant correlation between wish and avoidance thinking and re-experience of PTSD (r (358)=0.12, p<0.05). In addition, there were positive significant correlation between accountability and PTSD (r (358)=0.18, p<0.001), re-experience of PTSD (r (358)=0.12, p<0.05), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=0.15, p<0.001), hyper-arousal of PTSD (r (358)=0.22, p<0.001). In addition, there were positive significant correlation between Trouble and escape and PTSD (r (358)=0.15, p<0.01), re-experience of PTSD (r (358)=0.10, p<0.05), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=0.13, p<0.05), hyperarousal of PTSD (r (358)=0.19, p<0.001). While; there were negative significant correlation between problem solving and PTSD (r (358)=-0.58, p<0.001), re-experience of PTSD (r=-0.46, p<0.001), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=-0.59, p<0.001), hyperarousal of PTSD (r (358)=-0.54, p<0.001). In addition, there were negative significant correlation between reinterpretation and PTSD (r (358)=-0.50, p<0.001), reexperience of PTSD (r (358)=-0.34, p<0.001), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=-0.53, p=0.001), hyper-arousal of PTSD (r (358)=-0.49, p<0.001). In addition, there were negative significant correlation between affiliation and PTSD (r (358)=-0.20, p<0.001), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=-0.30, p<0.001), hyper-arousal of PTSD (r=-0.198, p<0.001). In addition, there were negative significant correlation between self-control and PTSD (r (358)=-0.15, p<0.01), avoidance of PTSD (r (358)=-0.19, p<0.001), hyper-arousal of PTSD (r (358)=-0.13, p<0.01) (Table 9).

Variable PTSD Re-experiencing Avoidance Hyper arousal
Wish and avoidance thinking 0.08 0.12* 0.05 0.07
Problem solving -0.58*** -0.46*** -0.59*** -0.54***
Re-interpretation -0.50*** -0.34*** -0.53*** -0.49***
Affiliation -0.20*** -0.04 -0.30*** -0.19***
Accountability 0.18*** 0.12* 0.15*** 0.22***
Self-control -0.15** -0.08 -0.19*** -0.13**
Trouble and escape 0.15** 0.10* 0.13* 0.19***

Table 9: Correlation between coping strategies and mental health problems.

Discussion

This study aimed to find the prevalence of PTSD among patients with cancer, explore the types of coping strategies used by patients diagnosed with cancer and to elaborate the relationship between PTSD and coping strategies among patients with cancer in Gaza Strip. Our study results showed that 42.5% of patients with cancer reported PTSD. Such findings could be as a result of concept of cancer being a traumatic event and dangerous disease so they try to avoid thoughts, feelings, or actions that remind the patient with it. Patients with cancer struggle to survive and they try to avoid the thoughts or situation that may repeat their experience with such disease. Our findings were inconsistent with the results of Lindberg and Wellisch in study of 73 patients at the UCLA/Revlon High Risk Clinic [22], which cares for women who are at familial risk for breast cancer, three subjects (4%) endorsed items in a manner that satisfied the DSM-IV criteria for a PTSD diagnosis. Also, 37% of the participant's criteria for the intrusion symptom cluster, 8% met criteria for the avoidance symptom cluster, and 7% met criteria for the arousal symptom cluster.

Our rate of PTSD was much higher than rate found in Kangas et al. in a study investigated the predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following a diagnosis of cancer [23]. Individuals who were recently diagnosed with 1st onset head and neck or lung malignancy (N=82) were assessed within 1 month of diagnosis for acute stress disorder (ASD) and other psychological responses including depression; individuals were reassessed (N=63) for PTSD 6 months following their cancer diagnosis. At the initial assessment ASD was diagnosed in 28% of participants, and 22% met criteria for PTSD at 6-months follow-up. Our rate of PTSD was much higher that rate of PTSD found in Hahn et al. in a study of 162 cancer survivors which showed that 29% of the sample had PTSD [8]. Also, rate of PTSD in this study was higher that found in study of Voigt et al (2017) which investigated prevalence and course of posttraumatic stress in patients with early breast cancer (BC) during their first year after diagnosis and determined effects of mastectomy and chemotherapy. Stress disorder (ASD or PTSD) related to breast cancer was diagnosed in 6 (3.6%) of 166 patients before treatment and in 3 patients (2.0%) 1 year later. In 60 controls, no diagnosis of stress disorder, a rate of 18% women experiencing PTSD symptoms. Our study showed that re-experience of PTSD symptoms was significantly more among patients 40 years old and less. Such results may be attributed that young patients are thinking of their future, life situation, and their disease progress. While the 70 years and more didn’t think about of the disease since they feel that they reached the age to live, and they didn’t care about the situations they live.

Our findings showed that the most commonly used coping strategies were: affiliation, reinterpretation, self-control, problem solving, wish and avoidance thinking, trouble and escape, and finally accountability. We hypothesized that patients with cancer have high spirituality and attribute their disease to God significance not others. They believe in Allah and the causes in which they are diseased, so they demonstrate affiliation on their behavior and socializing process. However, these patients accommodated to various aspects of their disease because of their use for affiliation and coped effectively to their cancer. We found a being diagnosed as cancer, patients do not tend to assign responsibility on themselves and their character, since they possibly need to avoid guilt, low self-esteem, and social distance, and to maintain a potential to invest in the adjustment process appeared to be consistent with our results regardless the priority of the coping strategies. However, in another study by Mytko et al. found that escape-avoidance was related to psychological distress on several measures [24]. Item endorsement analyses of the escape-avoidance sub scale suggest that patients may have used more passive than active avoidance strategies, which demonstrate the importance of the traumatic cause and its related consequences. Others found that problem-focused coping was less frequent for existential issues, whereas emotion-focused strategies were used less frequently for physical stressors [25]. However, in a study of Silva et al. found that the coping strategy of escapeavoidance and self-control was the most used coping by patients with psoriasis and both groups present high-stress levels [26], which indicate the difference between the cultures in using ways of coping. While, in a study of Rntmsc et al. distancing was the most frequently reported coping strategy [27], and men seemed to focus on the positive side more often than women did. These results indicate the importance of the coping strategies according to community and it’s depending on culture or belief of people. However, Büssing et al. found that Arabic patients with a Muslim background had significantly higher scores for spirituality and religious questionnaire scales than German patients, namely [28], "Search for meaningful support", "Trust in higher source", "Positive interpretation of disease", and "Support in relations of life through " scale which demonstrate the consistency with our results.

There were positive significant correlation between wish and avoidance thinking and re-experience of PTSD among the study sample of patients with cancer. The researcher hypothesized that because patients with cancer have stressful life events which different from other people and this cause them re-experience PTSD as a result of their disease so they cope ineffectively with these situations. The researcher hypothesized that the positive correlation between accountability and re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyper-arousal of PTSD among the study sample of patients with cancer came from the nature of cancer that they experience and its consequences. Furthermore, it depends on the severity of the cancer and its type and at what stage the cancer ends.

We hypothesized that the positive correlation between trouble and escape and re-experience of PTSD, avoidance of PTSD, hyper-arousal of PTSD among the study sample of patients with cancer depend on the socio-demographic variables for these patients, since it differs according age, sex, and marital status. Which consistent with the results of Tan, who found that there was a positive correlation between social support and problem-focused coping strategies (confident approach, optimistic approach [29], and seeking social support); that is, mean social support scores increased as the mean problem-focused coping strategy scores increased. But, in consistent with the results of Hee-Seung et al. found that stress was negatively correlated with both problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping [30]. Korean patients with cancer used emotion-focused coping strategies more than problem-focused coping strategies. The result found that there were significant differences in most of coping strategies; problem solving, reinterpretation, and affiliation according to PTSD in favor to non-PTSD patients with cancer of the study sample. We hypothesized that the differences related to the type of cancer which the patients suffering and at what age the cancer start and/or who the patient (male/female) also the marital status. All these factors play significant role in the connection between the type of coping strategies used and PTSD subtypes. Non-traumatized patients usually have simple or mild cancer type and/or may be old age and singles or widowed patients. These patients accommodated effectively with cancer. Others in study of patients with head and neck cancer found that denial, substance use, behavioural disengagement, venting, and self-blame at diagnosis were significantly correlated with lower HRQL and higher post-traumatic stress at follow-up [31]. Similarly, in another study of patients with incurable cancer, most reported high utilization of emotional support coping (77.0%), whereas fewer reported high utilization of acceptance (44.8%), self-blame (37.9%), and denial (28.2%). Emotional support and acceptance correlated with better QOL and mood. Denial and self-blame correlated with worse QOL and mood [32].

Clinical Implication

Our findings highlight the need for establishment of new services for cancer patients with mental health problems in general hospitals. Also, counseling services for cancer patients inside the cancer unites must be established Also, family support groups for such patients must be initiated to improve communications and interactions between family members, as well as teaching problem-solving skills to assist the family members in confronting the mental health problems associated with cancer. Home visit programs include regular visits from metal health specialist or psychiatric a nurse or other health professional to the homes of patients with cancer for support and guidance. Special activities for young patients with cancer to relief their anxiety, such as sports, art and music should be established in cancer units. Educational programs for the caregivers and the employees to detect early signs and symptoms of psychological phenomena have associated with cancer.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image

Share This Article