Reach Us +32 28087017

Abstract

A comparison of policy barriers pre and post COVID-19 onset for FQHCs delivering MAT services via telehealth

Before COVID-19, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and providers faced a myriad of barriers utilizing telehealth as a method to treat patients for substance use disorder (SUD). Patients with SUD can receive medicationassisted treatment (MAT). Despite MAT being considered the gold standard of treatment by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM), only 10% of patients requiring treatment have access to care. Prior to the onset of COVID-19, FQHCs implementing programs to increase access to MAT through telehealth encountered barriers such as reimbursement requirements and regulations that restricted its use. With the declaration of the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), how healthcare was delivered changed, and telehealth emerged to the forefront. COVID-19 policy changes eliminated some of the barriers that prevented the use of telehealth services to treat SUD through MAT. This study examines policy barriers FQHCs faced with implementing telehealth MAT programs before COVID-19 in five states with high mortality rates from opioid use and received grants to address the opioid epidemic from the federal Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA). A secondary analysis was conducted during the COVID-19 PHE to examine if/how the policy barriers had changed for FQHCs implementing telehealth MAT programs. With many of the barriers removed, FQHCs could now implement and offer telehealth MAT programs. Although access to services has increased, most telehealth policy expansions will only last while the PHE exists. Additionally, other issues such as broadband access as well as accessibility for disabled populations remain


Author(s): Christine Calouro

Abstract | PDF

Share this  Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  Google+
30+ Million Readerbase
Recommended Conferences
Flyer image