Peer Review Process

The General Surgery Reports adopts double blind review process which is closely monitored by the editors. Editors undertake editorial review to assess the quality and type of submission before sending it to the review process. Manuscripts not meeting the scientific standards will not be considered for the reviewing process. Authors are expected to pay attention to the instructions for authors and also indicate the category in which they are publishing if it is not a research article. Editors will also check the readability, grammatical usage and may ask for resubmission if papers fare poorly in these parameters. The final decision is taken by the chief editor by considering all comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers

Awards Nomination 17+ Million Readerbase
Recommended Conferences
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 12

General Surgery Reports received 12 citations as per Google Scholar report

General Surgery Reports peer review process verified at publons
Abstracted/Indexed in
  • Google Scholar
  • Publons

View More »

Flyer image