Previous Page  25 / 65 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 65 Next Page
Page Background

Page 45

May 24-25, 2018

London, UK

Vascular Surgery 2018

3

rd

Edition of World Congress & Exhibition on

Vascular Surgery

Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy

ISSN: 2573-4482

Introduction:

Duplex scanning is currently the best method to

detect stenotic lesions that threaten bypass graft patency. The

correction of these lesions may improve long term patency of

grafts and limb salvage rates. The aimof this study is to investigate

the effects of duplex surveillance post femoro-popliteal bypass

graft for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in terms of graft

patency and limb salvage.

Methodology:

A retrospective analysis of 59 patients who had

underwent femoro-popliteal bypass graft for CLTI between Jan

2009 and April 2014. Data was collected from the electronic

computer record and analyzed using SPSS v24.

Results:

Of 59 patients; 49 (83.1%) had autologous vein graft, 8

(13.6%) prosthetic vein grafts and 2 (3.4%) composite graft. Mean

follow up was 13.6 (0-64) months. Mean age was 77 (58-96) years.

Duplex scan surveillance was performed in 35 (71.4%) patients

at 3, 6, 9, 18 and 24 months post operatively; 27 in autologous

vein, 7 in prosthetic graft and 1 in composite. Positive findings of

occluded graft were noted in 10 duplex scans; all blocked grafts

were autologous vein grafts. Out of the 17 patent vein grafts,

stenosis was noted in 9 veins requiring angioplasty. Two patients

needed amputation after angioplasty. Primary patency at 1 and 2

yrs. for duplex surveillance group was 71.4% and no surveillance

group was 54.2%. Within two years 21 patients needed major

amputation. Total amputation rate was 35.5%. Ten amputations in

patient who were on surveillance were 28.5% and eleven who had

no surveillance were 45.8%. At 7 years amputation free survival

(AFS) was 48.6% vs. 16.7% in no surveillance group (HR 0.52 95%

CI 0.28-0.99 p=0.047); Limb salvage was 71.4% vs. 54.2% (HR

0.57 95% CI 0.24-1.35 p=0.203) and overall survival was 71.4%

vs. 33.3% (HR 0.37 95% CI 0.168–0.817 p=0.14).

Conclusion:

In our cohort the important clinical outcomes

following bypass surgery for chronic limb threatening ischemia

are far better if patients were enrolled in a local graft surveillance

protocol.

Recent Publications

1. Davies A H, Hawdon

A J, Sydes M R and

Thompson A G

(2005) Is Duplex

surveillance

of

value after leg vein

bypass

grafting?

C i r c u l a t i o n

112:1985-1991.

2. Hawdon A J, et al. (2003) Vein graft surveillance: is the

yield worth the effort? Acta Chir Belg 103:379-382.

3. Baril D T and Marone L K (2012) Duplex evaluation

following femoropopliteal angioplasty and stenting:

criteria and utility of surveillance. Vascular and

Endovascular Surgery 46:353-357.

4. Bui T D, Mills J L Sr, et al. (2012) The natural history

of duplex detected stenosis after femoropopliteal

endovascular therapy suggests questionable clinical

utility of routine duplex surveillance. Journal of Vascular

Surgery 55:346–352.

5. Abu Dhabri A M, Mohammed K, et al. (2017) Systemic

review and meta-analysis of duplex ultrasound

surveillance for infrainguinal vein bypass grafts. Journal

of Vascular Surgery 66:1885-1891.

Biography

Sanjay Singh has his expertise and passion in Vascular and Endovascular

Surgery. He has done complex aortic endovascular fellowship and is a Vas-

cular Consultant working in United Kingdom. His open and contextual surgi-

cal techniques are based on researched and practiced models which helped

to create new pathways for innovation. He has achieved this aptitude after

years of experience in research and teaching in university hospitals and insti-

tutions. The ever-responsive and adapting field of Endovascular Surgery has

improved the survival rates of high risk patients

dr_sanjaysingh@hotmail.com

Does duplex surveillance after femoro-popliteal bypass

grafting affect long term graft patency?

Sanjay Singh, Rushmi Purmessur

and

Arun Nair

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, UK

Sanjay Singh et al., J Vasc Endovasc Therapy 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2573-4482-C1-002