Previous Page  40 / 43 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 43 Next Page
Page Background

Food Chemistry 2018

Journal of Food, Nutrition and Population Health

ISSN: 2577-0586

Page 98

July 23-24, 2018

Rome, Italy

3

rd

Edition of International Conference on

Agriculture &

Food Chemistry

J Food Nutr Popul Health 2018, Volume 2

DOI: 10.21767/2577-0586-C2-006

S

tarch, as a major component of dough’s, can significant affect

the rheological properties. Understanding effects of different

botanical starches on the rheological properties of dough can help us

to enhance the technological properties of dough’s and the products’

quality. In this study, starch-gluten and starch-hydroxy propyl methyl

cellulose (HPMC) model dough’s were prepared, and effects of wheat

starch (WS), corn starch (CS), tapioca starch (TS), sweet potato

starch (SS) and potato starch (PS) on the rheological properties

and moisture distribution of dough’s were investigated. For gluten

doughy, WS showed greatest linear viscoelasticity region (0.190%),

lowest frequency dependence (0.128) and greatest recovery

capacity (67.39%), while PS showed smallest linear viscoelasticity

region (0.126%), greatest frequency dependence (0.195) and lowest

recovery capacity (54.97%). Furthermore, WS–gluten dough showed

highest disulfide bonds content (3.47μmol/g), lowest intensity of

extracted glutenin bands and highest bond water content (23.20%).

This suggested that WS–gluten dough formed stronger starch–gluten

interactions compared with the other four starch–gluten dough’s. For

gluten-free dough’s, WS showed greatest linear viscoelasticity region

(0.104%), frequency dependence (0.236) and recovery capacity

(31.79%), while PS showed lowest viscoelasticity region (0.077%),

frequency dependence (0.160) and recovery capacity (19.33%).

Furthermore, PS-HPMC dough showed higher free water content

(85.05%) than the other four starch-HPMC dough’s. This suggested

that more water distributed between hydration sites of HPMC and

PS surface, leading to more hydrogen bonds and the formation of

stable PS-HPMC network. In conclusion, the rheological properties

of model dough’s are largely due to the variation in structural and

physicochemical properties of different starches, and the varying

interactions between different starches and gluten/HPMC.

mutaihua@126.com

Comparative study of starches from five different sources

on the rheological properties of gluten and gluten-free

model dough’s

Taihua Mu

Institute of Food Science and Technology-CAAS, China