Previous Page  12 / 25 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 25 Next Page
Page Background

PCOS 2018

Journal of Clinical and Molecular Endocrinology

ISSN: 2572-5432

Page 40

June 07-08, 2018

London, UK

4

th

World Congress on

Polycystic Ovarian

Syndrome

N

o consistent association between polycystic ovary syndrome

(PCOS) and risk for breast cancer (BC) was observed in a

recent systematic review, although it “incorrectly” reported that

“no consistent association between PCOS risk and breast cancer

was observed”. However, long-term use of oral contraceptives

(OC) is considered a first line therapy for PCOS and their

possible association to BC could be a concern in the informed

consent process. In the most recent publication of UpToDate, it

is stated as, “a non-significant increase (of BC) in ever users of

OCs compared with nonusers”. However, the latter conclusion

of a related meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies is

connected with an irrelevant reference and more importantly the

original paper states that “this meta-analysis provides evidence

of a non-significant increase in BC risk associated with ever OC

use, but the risk for long-term OC users is significantly greater”.

Furthermore, two major meta-analyses are totally ignored in this

publication: 1. The collaborative group on hormonal factors in BC

meta-analysis which suggested, “a causal relationship between

OC use and BC”, and 2. A meta-analysis of case-control studies

which concluded that “use of OCs is associated with an increased

risk of premenopausal BC, especially with use before first full-

term pregnancy in parous women”. For a reliable sharing decision

with the patient, the accuracy and sufficiency of information is

always very important.

giatrakis@teiath.gr

PCOS, oral contraceptives and the accuracy of information

Georgios Iatrakis

Athens University of Applied Sciences, Greece

J Clin Mol Endocrinol 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2572-5432-C1-003