Previous Page  16 / 29 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 29 Next Page
Page Background

Volume 3, Issue 4 (Suppl)

J Clin Exp Orthop

ISSN:2471-8416

Osteoporosis and Arthroplasty 2017

December 04-05, 2017

Page 40

Notes:

&

11

th

International Conference on

Joint Event

OSTEOPOROSIS, ARTHRITIS & MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS

December 04-05, 2017 | Madrid, Spain

10

th

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTHROPLASTY

M G Bryant, J Clin Exp Orthop 2017, 3:4(Suppl)

DOI: 10.4172/2471-8416-C1-002

Exploring the degradation mechanisms and preclinical testing of modular tapers - Past, Present and

Future

W

ith more people living longer healthier lives, the demand for high performance joint replacements is continuously

growing as are the demands on the performance of the artificial joints to operate for longer periods. Whilst revision due

to corrosion-related failure seems to increase, there is a need to understand the metal-biological interfaces from a clinical and

pre-clinical perspective. The degradation mechanisms of metallic orthopaedic joints are a complex mixture of mechanical and

electrochemical reactions, better known as tribocorrosion. Degradation through wear and corrosion results in changes in local

environments eliciting soft tissue reactions often requiring intervention. This will also have a direct impact on the performance

of the devices not only from a wear but also electrochemical aspect. Not only do interfacial degradation mechanisms need to

be considered from a surface integrity point of view, their specific roles and influence on the degradation products generated

and their systematic effects need to be understood. Modular taper interfaces present a current and timely issue in total joint

replacements. Whilst work has been active in this area over the past few decades, many of the methods used to assess these

interfaces remain basic and the effects of taper variables on the complex degradation mechanisms remain unknown. This is

despite the tribocorrosion processes, or fretting-corrosion in this case, established at this interface has been implicated in

high revision rates due to metal related biological responses. Comparison of in-vitro modular taper test methods with

in-

vivo

retrievals present fascinating differences that presently have not been recreated in laboratory conditions. This paper will

present the current understanding around the degradation mechanisms occurring at the modular taper interface. Furthermore

the need for future physiologically representative test methods for assessing operational envelopes of new devices and the time

dependant degradation processes will be discussed.

Recent Publications:

1. S Kurtz, KOng, E Lau, FMowat andMHalpern (2007) Projections of Primary and RevisionHip and Knee Arthroplasty

in the United States from 2005 to 2030. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 89 (4): 780-785.

2. MMorlock, D Bunte, J Guhrs and N Bishop (2017) Corrosion of the Head-Stem Taper Junction-Are We on the Verge

of an Epidemic? HSS J. 13 (1): 42-49.

3. H S Hothi, A K Matthies, R Berber, R KWhittaker, J A Skinner and A J Hart (2014) The Reliability of a Scoring System

for Corrosion and Fretting, and Its Relationship to Material Loss of Tapered, Modular Junctions of Retrieved Hip

Implants. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 29 (6): 1313-1317.

Biography

M G Bryant is currently developing research and teaching activities devoted to modern aspects of corrosion, tribology and surface science. This includes surface chemical

effects in energy production, bio-tribology, bio-corrosion and methods of mitigation. His research is concerned with understanding and optimising the interactions occurring

at interfaces commonly found in many applications. His research addresses a wide range of applications including aerospace, automotive, orthopaedic, cardiovascular

and incontinence technologies.

M.G.Bryant@leeds.ac.uk

M G Bryant

University of Leeds, UK