Previous Page  33 / 35 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 35 Next Page
Page Background

Infectious Diseases 2018

Journal of Prevention and Infection Control

ISSN: 2471-9668

Page 72

June 07-08, 2018

London, UK

8

th

Edition of International Conference on

Infectious Diseases

T

he direct fluorescent antibody test (DFA) is the standard test

for the diagnosis of both animal and human rabies. This test

detects lyssavirus antigen on brain-infected tissues and central

nervous tissues including salivary glands. In this study, we

used the molecular quantitative real-time reverse transcription

polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and immunologic direct

rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT) as alternatives to DFA.

A total of 278 specimens were initially subjected to DFA. The

specimens were brought in two batches: the first batch consisting

of 260 brain and salivary gland tissue specimens collected from

dog markets in South East Nigeria from October 2015 to July

2016, and the other comprising 18 brain specimens from rabies-

suspect dogs from both veterinary hospitals and dog markets.

From the first batch, 10 brain and 7 salivary gland samples were

DFApositive.Thereafter, the10DFApositivebrainsamples and the

10 salivary gland samples from the DFA positive brain tissues and

the 18 samples from rabies-suspect dogs (n=28) were subjected

to DFA, dRIT and RT-qPCR. Using DFA, dRIT and RT-qPCR, 82.1%

(n=23), 100% (n=28) and 96.4% (n=27) were positive for lyssavirus

antigen, respectively. Then, of the 10 salivary gland samples

tested, 70% (n=7), 90% (n=9) and 20% (n=2) were positive for DFA,

dRIT and RT-qPCR, respectively. In this study, dRIT gave similar

result (100%) with the molecular RT-qPCR. This shows that dRIT

is a highly sensitive diagnostic test for rabies diagnosis and was

superior to the DFA. The RT-qPCR is highly sensitive as it was able

to detect very low lyssavirus concentration in brain tissues. The

discordance of the DFA and dRIT results underscore that rabies

is under-reported in Africa considering that many laboratories do

not have the capability to undertake molecular analysis.

ukamakauchenna.eze@unn.edu.ng

Lyssavirus surveillance in dogs in South-East Nigeria:

application of molecular and immunological assays

Eze U U

1

, Coertzer A

2

, Anene B M

1

, Ezeokonkwo R C

1

, Nwosuh C

4

, Nel L H

2

and

Sabeta C T

2, 5

1

University of Nigeria, , Nigeria

2

University of Pretoria, South Africa

3

National Veterinary Research Institute, Nigeria

4

Agricultural Research Council - Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, South Africa

J Prev Infect Cntrol 2018, Volume 4

DOI: 10.21767/2471-8084-C1-003