Previous Page  3 / 6 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 6 Next Page
Page Background

Journal of Infectious Diseases and Treatment

ISSN: 2472-1093

Clinical Pathology & Epidemiology 2019

Page 25

Clinical Pathology and Epidemiology

February 27-28, 2019 | Prague, Czech Republic

7

th

Euroscicon Conference on

T

he qualified expert assessment of potential environmental and health

risks connected to planned industrial, transport and other construction

activities becomes an indispensable part of their audit. Whereas the initial

phase of risk assessment, the identification of potential human exposure is

of pure scientific character, the actual risk assessment increasingly assumes

thearbitrary aspects (e.g. safety coefficients), risk communication, its control

and management by way of psychological aspects; the collective decision

making then becomes a hotly debated political issue. When evaluating

perception of environmental risks, psychosocial and psychosomatic factors

may be of fundamental importance. This is the case in particular where our

knowledge of the true health consequences of exposure to a given factor

is incomplete or its action is within the range of values where we do not

anticipate the measurable biological effect. This applies not only in the case

of the indoor environment related complains but also e.g. to that of non-

ionizing electromagnetic radiation and electro-ionic microclimate. A serious

consequence found in the syndrome of mass hysteria is the fact that due

to differently motivated disinformation, part of the population can suffer

from some psychosomatic symptoms. Those imply objective suffering

and deteriorating quality of life for those affected. The prevention of such

conditions can either be systematic: early educational or popularisation

campaigns, specific health education orientated to the development of

industrial, transportation, or other types of constructions, and integration of

the local civic activities in the program. The purpose of this should not be a

cheap belittling of the risk but a reasonable explaining of its acceptable rate,

and also the likely advantage to benefit from the realization of the structures.

Any later efforts to inform the public about the true state of affairs are

normally accepted with distrust and disbelief.

Risk perception and environmental

risk management in protection of

public health

Vladimir Bencko, John M. Quinn

and Jana Zvarova

First Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Czech Republic

Biography

Vladimir Bencko has graduated from the Medical

Faculty of Charles University in Prague in 1961.

He was appointed with the Institute of Hygiene

(presently the National Institute of Public Health)

from 1967-1972. He was an Assistant Professor at

the Chair of General and Environmental Hygiene,

Medical Faculty of Hygiene, Charles University from

1973-1986. Since 1972, he was temporary Advisor

of WHO. During 1990-1992, he was an Advisor to

the Federal Committee for Environment of CSFR.

Since 1993, he is temporary Consultant of the NATO

Committee on Challenges to Modern Society later

transformed into the present NATO Science for

Peace and Security. Since 2001 up to 2008, he is a

Representative of the Czech Republic in the Standing

Committee of the European Medical Research

Councils. He is a Founding Member of the Central

and Eastern European Chapter of International

Society of Environmental Epidemiology and in years

1999-2001 President elect of the Chapter.

vladimir.bencko@lf1.cuni.cz

Vladimir Bencko et al., J Infec Dis Treat 2019, Volume: 5

DOI: 10.21767/2472-1093-C1-007