Previous Page  3 / 9 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 9 Next Page
Page Background

Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy

ISSN: 2573-4482

May 24-25, 2018

London, UK

Vascular Surgery 2018

Page 17

3

rd

Edition of World Congress & Exhibition on

Vascular Surgery

Objective:

Debate about carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and

carotid stenting (CAS) efficacies continues despite many

reports. The aimof this study was to evaluate the early outcomes

and restenosis rate of CEA versus CAS using propensity score

matching (PSM).

Methods:

Retrospective review of database was conducted for

the patients who underwent CEA or CAS between January 2002

and December 2015 at a single institute. We investigated the 30-

day incidenceof amajor adverse clinical event (MACE; definedas

stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or death)

and procedure related complication, restenosis rate during the

follow up period. PSM were used to create a balanced group of

CEA and CAS patient who were matched for following factors:

age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking,

atrial fibrillation, previous percutaneous coronary intervention

or coronary artery bypass grafting, valvular heart disease,

contralateral carotid occlusion, degree of carotid stenosis, and

symptomatic status. Comparisons of outcomes in this matched

group of patients were performed using logistic regression

analysis and log rank test.

Results:

Among total 1184 patients (654 CEA and 530 CAS),

matched groups of 452 CEA and 452 CAS were created after

PSM. Within the propensity-matched group, the CAS group was

showedhigher 30-day incidenceofMACE (7.5%vs. 2.4%; OR [odd

ratio] 3.261; 95% CI [confidence interval], 1.634-6.509; p=0.001)

but lower incidence of procedure related complication (1.5%

vs. 5.3%; OR, 0.199; CI, 0.075-0.528; p=0.001). The CAS group

showed higher restenosis rate (1.5% vs. 1.0% at 12months, 5.4%

vs. 1.2%at 24months; p=0.008) than CEA group during themean

49.1 months follow up period (range, 1-180 months).

Conclusion:

In this study based on propensity score matching

analysis, CEA showed lower 30-day incidence of major adverse

clinical event and restenosis rate during the followup period than

CAS for revascularization of carotid artery stenosis.

Recent Publications

1. Kyu Hyun Han and Dong Ik Kim (2016) Enhancement of

angiogenic effects by hypoxia-preconditioned human

umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells in a

mouse ischemic limb model. Cell Biology International

40(1):27-35.

2. AeKyeongKimandDong IkKim(2016) Inhibitoryeffects

of mesenchymal stem cells in intimal hyperplasia

after balloon angioplasty. Journal of Vascular Surgery

63(2):510-517.

3. Seon Hee Heo and Dong Ik Kim (2015) Early results of

clinical application of autologous whole bone marrow

stem cell transplantation for critical limb ischemia

in patients with Buerger’s disease. Scientific Report

21:19690.

4. Keun Myoung Park and Dong Ik Kim (2015) Factors

affecting anatomical changes after endovascular

abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Thoracic and

Cardiovascular Surgery 63(2):139-45.

5. SeungWonShin,DongIkKimandSoongHoUm(2014)A

fluorescence color-encoded lipid-supported polymeric

particle. Colloids and Surface B: Biointerfaces 122:840-

845.

Comparison of results between carotid

endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting

using propensity score matching analysis

Dong Ik Kim

Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea

Dong Ik Kim, J Vasc Endovasc Therapy 2018, Volume 3

DOI: 10.21767/2573-4482-C1-001