European Journal of Experimental Biology Open Access

  • ISSN: 2248-9215
  • Journal h-index: 45
  • Journal CiteScore: 34.35
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Research Article - (2018) Volume 8, Issue 5

Proximate, Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Brillantaisia owariensis Leaves and Sorghum vulgare Leaf-Sheath

Akuru UB1*, Amadi BA2 and Abbey BW3

1Department of Biochemistry, Rivers State University, Nigeria

2Department of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

3Department of Medical Biochemistry, Rivers State University, Nigeria

Corresponding Author:

Akuru UB
Department of Biochemistry
Rivers State University, Nigeria
E-mail: minebrantley@gmail.com

Received Date: Aug 24, 2018; Accepted Date: Oct 05, 2018; Published Date: Sep 15, 2018

Citation: Akuru UB, Amadi BA, Abbey BW (2018) Proximate, Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Brillantaisia owariensis Leaves and Sorghum vulgare Leaf-Sheath. Eur Exp Biol Vol. 8 No. 5:32. doi:10.21767/2248-9215.100073

Copyright: © 2018 Akuru UB, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at European Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Proximate, amino acid and fatty acid composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Brillantaisia owariensis and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath was studied. The amino acid content was assayed using High performance liquid chromatograpy while the fatty acid content was assayed using gas chromatograpy. The results from this research, showed that the ash and protein content of Eremomastax polysperma (3.91 ± 0.01%; 3.80 ± 0.05%) was significantly higher than Sorghum vulgare (1.74 ± 0.03%; 1.21 ± 0.05%), and B. owariensis (3.39 ± 0.01%; 1.61 ± 0.01%) respectively. The total essential amino acid composition of Eremomastax polysperma (43.18g/100g) was higher than Brillantaisia owariensis (39.41g/100g) and S. vulgare (31.40g/100g), with lysine and cysteine concentration of B. owariensis (9.72; 9.45) been higher than E. polysperma (9.48;6.59g/ 100g) and S. vulgare (4.11 and 7.19g/100g). The total nonessential amino acid composition of Sorghum vulgare leafsheath (59.49g/100g ) was higher than Eremomastax polysperma (53.09g/100g) and Brillantaisia owariensis (53.82g/100g), with glutamate (14.69, 20.08 and 14.46g/ 100g) and aspartate (12.21, 13.22 and 10.64g/100g) having a higher concentration for E. polysperma, S. vulgare and B. owareinsis respectively. For the fatty acid composition, Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath (17.51%) had a higher oleic acid concentration than Eremomastax polysperma (1.50%) and Brillantaisia owariensis (5.96%). Brillantaisia owariensis had a higher palmitic acid (35.30%) and behenic acid (14.17%) than Eremomastax polysperma (0.00% and 13.13%) and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath(25.96% and 12.21%) . Whereas Eremomastax polysperma had a higher myristic, magaric and linolenic acid concentration (45.91%; 20.27% and 10.45%) than Brillantaisia owariensis (37.23%; 0.36% and 0.00%) and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath (37.24%; 0.11% and 0.03%) respectively. The results obtained from this research implies that Eremomastax polysperma, Brillantaisia owariensis leaves and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath have nutritional benefits.

Keywords

Proximate; Amino acid; Fatty acid

Introduction

Plant derived foods are associated with reducing disease risks, particularly cardiovascular disease and some cancer. Plants are sources of a number of nutrients that may have beneficial effect on health, such as vitamin C, dietary fibre and minerals [1]. Proximate analysis gives a partitioning of food into six fraction: moisture, ash, crude protein, crude fibre, lipid and carbohydrate. The ash content of a food is used to measure the inorganic residue of the food [2]. Dietary fibre helps in lowering blood glucose concentration and reduces the chance of gastrointestinal problems such as constipation and diarrhoea [3]. Carbohydrate functions as a source of energy; required for the biosynthesis of glycogenic amino acids and inco-operated in RNA and many nucleotides (ribose sugar). Whereas proteins are necessary for growth and tissue maintenance; appropriate pH maintenance; defence and detoxification of harmful substance; formation of essential body components such as hormones and transport of nutrients.

Proteins are the basis for the major structural components of animal and human tissue. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins which contain a carboxylic acid group and an amino group. Amino acids are essential in the synthesis of proteins and precursors in the formation of secondary metabolism molecules that participate in cell signaling, gene expression and homeostasis regulation, protein phosphorylation, synthesis of hormones and antioxidant capacity. Also, amino acids participate in various physiological processes such as skeletal muscle function, atrophic conditions, sarcopenia and cancer [4].

Fatty acids on the other hand, are carbon chains with a methyl group at one end of the molecule (designated omega, w) and a carboxyl group at the other end. Fatty acids have high energy level, are components of cell membrane (phospholipids), used for insulation and are also involved in gene regulation (transcription) [5]. There are essential [linoleic acid (C18:2n-6, n-6) and α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3), an n-3] and non-essential fatty acids. The essential fatty acid helps in reducing cardiovascular diseases [6,7]. Hence the objective of this study is to determine the proximate, amino acids and fatty acids composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Brillantaisia owariensis leaves and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath.

Materials and Methods

Collection of plant sample

The plants; Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath was bought from mile 3 market while Eremomastax polysperma and Brillantaisia owariensis were gotten from a farm at Rumokoro (Lat 4.88999; long 6.96922) all in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The plants were identified with voucher numbers: UPH/V/1325 (Brillantaisia owariensis) and UPH/V/1326 (Sorghum vulgare, synomyms sorghum bicolr) and UPH/V/1346 (Erempmastax polysperma) . They were dried and ground into fine powder with a blender and stored in an air tight container.

Proximate determination

The moisture, ash, lipid, proteins, crude fibre and carbohydrate content were determined according to AOAC (2011) method [8]. The energy value of the plants was calculated using % protein X4+% Lipid X9+% carbohydrate X4 (atwater factor) [9].

Amino acid and fatty acid determination

Amino acid contents were determined using HPLC and fatty acid composition was determined using gas chromatography.

Statistical analysis

Datas obtained were expressed as mean ± sem and subjected to one way-ANOVA using SPSS, with value p ≤ 0.05 is significantly different.

Results

Discussion

Proximate analysis is the process by which the major components or constituents of food material are determined to establish whether the food is normal or contaminated [2]. The Proximate composition of Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath, Brillantaisia owarensis and Eremomastax polysperma is shown in Table 1. The moisture content of each was 91.03 ± 0.22%, 75.79 ± 0.24% and 75.55 ± 0.06% for Sorghum vulgare leafs heath, Brillantaisia owarensis and Eremomastax polysperma respectively. The fat content of Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath, Brillantaisia owariensis and Eremomastax polysperma was 0.16 ± 0.01%, 0.33 ± 0.01% and 0.30±0.01% respectively. The dietary fibre of Brillantaisia owariensis (14.46 ± 0.01%) was significantly higher than (p ≤ 0.05) and Eremomastax polysperma (3.23 ± 0.01%) and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath (3.75 ± 0.01%). The protein and ash content of Eremomastax polysperma (3.80 ± 0.05%;3.91 ± 0.01%) was significantly higher than (p ≤ 0.05) Brillantaisia owariensis (1.61 ± 0.01% ;3.39 ± 0.01%) and Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath(1.21 ± 0.05%; 1.74 ± 0.03%).

Parameters Composition(%)
S. vulgare B. owariensis E. polysperma
Moisture 91.03 ± 0.22a  75.79 ± 0.24b 75.55 ± 0.06b
Carbohydrate 2.11 ± 0.15a  4.47 ± 0.21b 13.17 ± 0.01c
Protein 1.21 ± 0.05a  1.61 ± 0.01b 3.80 ± 0.05c
Ash 1.74 ± 0.03a  3.39 ± 0.01b 3.91 ± 0.01c
Fibre 3.75 ± 0.01a  14.41± 0.01b 3.23 ± 0.01c
Lipids 0.16 ± 0.01a  0.33 ± 0.01b 0.30 ± 0.01c
Energy value (kCal /100g) 14.72  27.29 70.58

Values are expressed as Mean±SEM. Values in a row with similar alphabetical superscript do not differ significantly p≤0.05

Table 1: Proximate composition of Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath, B. owariensis and E. polysperma.

Amino acids are the building block of proteins. There are essential and non-essential amino acids. The essential amino acids are histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine and tryptophan and valine. The nonessential ones are arginine, cysteine, glycine, glutamine, proline, tyrosine, alanine, asparagine, aspartate, glutamate and serine [10]. Glycine for instance is needed during periods of rapid growth and for biosynthesis of porphyrins of haemoglobin. Glutamate along with cysteine and glycine are components of glutathione (antioxidant). Methionine protects the liver from damage by poisons such as carbon tetrachloride, arsenic and chloroform. Phenylalanine and tyrosine helps in foetal childhood brain development. Tryptophan is used for nicotinic acid synthesis and as a precursor of serotonin (a vasoconstrictor). Proline and hydroxyl-proline are present in haemoglobin and cytochromes and also in collagen of connective tissues [3]. Aspartic acid function is essential for purine, pyrimidine, asparagine and inositol synthesis. Valine maintains the balance of branched chain amino acids, whereas alanine is involved on hepatic autophagy, gluconeogenesis and transamination.

Leucine regulates the protein turnover (mTOR signaling) and gene expression. Glycine, lysine, threonine and glutamate help to maintain intestinal integrity and health [4,11]. The results on Tables 2 and 3 shows the amino acid composition of composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath and Brillantaisia owariensis. The total non-essential amino acid composition of Sorghum vulgare leaf-sheath (59.49g/100g) was higher than Eremomastax polysperma (53.09g/100g) and Brillantaisia owariensis (53.82g/100g), with glutamate (14.69,20.08 and 14.46g/100g) and aspartate (12.21,13.22 and 10.64g/100g) having a higher concentration for E. polysperma, S. vulgare and B. owariensis respectively. The total essential amino acid composition of Eremomastax polysperma (43.18g/100g) was higher than Brillantaisia owariensis (39.41g/100g) and S. vulgare (31.40g/100g), with lysine and cysteine concentration of B. owariensis (9.72; 9.45) been higher than E. polysperma (9.48;6.59g/100g) and S. vulgare (4.11 and 7.19g/100g).

Components E. polysperma
(g/100g)
S. vulgare (g/100g) B. owariensis (g/100g)
Glycine 3.29 2.64 3.84
Alanine 4.07 5.43 2.97
Serine 3.84 2.27 4.78
Proline 3.91 3.42 3.02
Valine 2.47 1.33 4.64
Aspartate 12.21 13.22 10.64
Glutamate 14.69 20.08 14.46
Arginine 5.65 8.71 6.55
Tyrosine 2.96 2.39 2.92
Total 53.09 59.49 53.82

Table 2: Non-essential amino acids composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath and Brillantaisia owariensis.

Components E. polysperm (g/100g) S. vulgare (g/100g) B. owariensis (g/100g)
Threonine 4.28 3.55 4.27
Isoleucine 4.48 4.44 4.6
Leucine 6.59 7.19 9.45
Lysine 9.48 4.11 9.72
Methionine 1.54 3.23 1.49
Phenylalanine 6.86 3.91 3.99
Histidine 5.34 2.27 3.36
Tryptophan 1.23 1.21 1.11
Cysteine 3.38 1.49 1.42
Total 43.18 31.4 39.41

Table 3: Essential amino acids composition of Eremomastax polysperma, Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath and Brillantaisia owariensi.

The fatty acid content of Sorghum vulgare, Eremomastax polysperma and Brillantaisia owariensis is shown in Table 4. Fatty acids are carbon chain with a methyl group at one end and a carboxyl group at the other end of the molecule. Fatty acids can be saturated (straight chain hydrocarbon) or unsaturated (carbon-carbon double bond chains) fatty acids. The unsaturated fatty acids can be monounsaturated or polyunsaturated [5]. Fatty acids can also be essential or non-essential. The essential ones are required in diet, the body can-not synthesize them [examples are linoleic acid omega-6) and α-linolenic acid (omega-3)]. Essential fatty acids (EFA) are important for membrane fluidity and increases the number of receptors and other affinity to the respective hormones or growth factor. EFA has antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal properties; an example is linoleic acid which kills Staphylococcus aureus. Decosahexaenoic acid (DHA) a precursor of linoleic acid is a suppressor of pro-inflammatory cytokines(IL-1, IL-2, IL-6 and TNF-α), suggesting its anti-inflammatory properties [12]. For monounsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid (C18:0), they function in inhibiting Low density lipoproteins (LDL)-cholesterol oxidation and slows down atherosclerosis formation. MUFA are resistant to peroxidation and preserves HDL level [3]. From Table 4, the concentration of Oleic acid of Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath (17.51%) was higher than Brillantaisia owarensis leaf (5.96%) and Eremomastax polysperma leaf (1.53%). The linoleic acid concentration of Eremomastax polysperma (10.44%) was higher than of Sorghum vulgare leaf sheath (0.03%) and absent in Brillantaisia owariensis leaf (0.00%).

Components Name Percentage composition (%)
  Sorghum vulgare B. owariensis E. polysperma
C18:1 Oleic acid 17.51 5.96 1.5
C17 Magaric acid 0.11 0.36 20.27
C12 Lauric acid 6.9 6.97 7.97
C14 Myristic acid 37.24 37.22 45.91
C16 Palmitic acid 25.96 35.3 -
C20 Behenic acid 12.24 14.17 13.13
C18:2 Linoleic acid 0.03 - 10.44
C20 Behenic acid 12.24 14.17 13.13

Table 4: Fatty acid content of Sorghum vulgare, B. owariensis and E. polysperma.

Conclusion

The results obtained showed that these plants are sources of nutrients.

References

  1. Denny A, Buttriss J (2005) Plant foods and health: Focus on plant boactives. European food information resource 1-64.
  2. Onyeike EN and Ayalogu EO (2003) Techniques of proximate anaylsis of foods and food products. Research techniques in biological and chemical sciences. Springfield Publishers Limited. Chapter 17: 226-239.
  3. Srilakshmi B (2008) Carbohydrate. Nutrition science, 3rd edition, New age publishers. chapter 3-18: 21-321.
  4. Edgar FM, Orlando TO, Grelda AYF, Luis AZA, Norma ASC, et al. (2014) Determination of amino acids in medicinal plants from Southern Sonora, Mexico. Trop J Pharm Res 13: 601-606.
  5. Rustan CA, Drevon CA (2005) Fatty acids structure and properties. Encyclopedia of life sciences 1-7.
  6. Glick NR, Fischer MH (2013) The role of essential fatty acids in human health. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 18: 268-289.
  7. Arbex AK, Bizarro VR, Santos JCS, Araujo LMM, de Jesus ALC, et al. (2015) The impact of the essential fatty acids (EFA) in human health. Open J Endocr Metab Dis 5: 98-104.
  8. Onyeike EU, Anyalogu EO and Uzogara SG (1995) Influence of processing of African yam bean seed(sphenostylis stenocarpa) flour on the growth and organ weigths of rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 48: 85-93.
  9. Nelson DL, Cox MM (2005) Lehninger principles of biochemistry. 4th Edition, Chapter 2: 47-70.
  10. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2007) Amino acid requirements of adults. WHIO technical report series 935: 135-153.
  11. Das UN (2006) Biological significance of essential fatty acids. J Assoc Physicians India 54: 309-319.
  12. AOAC (2011) Official methods of analysis International, 18th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.