Journal of Animal Sciences and Livestock Production Open Access

  • ISSN: 2577-0594
  • Journal h-index: 8
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.79
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.57
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days

Research Article - (2021) Volume 5, Issue 1

Evaluation of A Rapid Visual Pregnancy (Bio- RPD) test for detection of Pregnancy Specific Protein B (PSPB) in Cow Serum

Osman A. Hameed1*, Mohammed Mustafa2, Niveen Madi3 and Willy Tate4

1Central Veterinary Laboratory, Khartoum, Sudan

2Al Safi Danone Farm, Animal Health Laboratories, Saudi Arabia

3American University of Beirut, Lebanon

4BioPRYN, Bio Tracking, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Osman A. Hameed
Central Veterinary Laboratory
Khartoum, Sudan
E-mail:
osmanhs@yahoo.com

Received date: October 14, 2020; Accepted date: October 20, 2020; Published date: October 30, 2020

Citation: Hameed OA, Mustafa M, Madi N, Tate W (2020) Evaluation of a Rapid Visual Pregnancy (Bio- RPD) Test for Detection of Pregnancy Specific Protein B (PSPB) in Cow Serum. J Anim Sci Livest Prod Vol.4 No.3:3

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Animal Sciences and Livestock Production

Abstract

The early pregnancy diagnosis allows optimizing production and timely management correction, with a greater reproductive output of livestock. The BioPRYN Rapid Visual Pregnancy Test® from Bio tracking USA consists of an ELISA for visual reading which does not require the use of readers in the laboratory, with satisfactory pregnancy diagnoses at 28 days of pregnancy in heifers and 30 days in cows. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of this rapid test (Bio-RPD) based on visual observation of color change and Optical Density (OD) using BioPRYN Flex ELISA. For this purpose, 92 serum samples from cows were tested. The numbers of positive pregnant samples obtained with Biorapid (Bio-RPD) were 63 (68.5 %) while with BioPRYN Flex ELISA was 66 (71.7%). The numbers of negative not pregnant samples were 25 (27.2%) with Bio-RPD while they were 26 (28.2%0) with BioPRYN ELISA. Three samples were recorded as recheck with Bio-RPD and they were pregnant with BioPRYN Flex. Only one sample was identified as pregnant by Bio-RPD (1.1%) while it is not pregnant by BioPRYN Flex ELISA (false positive). Test results were showing that accuracy of the BioPRYN Visual Pregnancy test kit with sensitivity of 99% compared to BioPRYN ELISA Pregnancy test kit. In conclusion, we recommend that the Bio-RPD visual test could be used as a rapid accurate tool for pregnancy diagnosis on farms which has no laboratory ELISA equipment or trans rectal ultrasonography.

Keywords

BioPRYN Rapid visual Pregnancy Test (Bio-PRD); BioPRYN Flex ELISA; Optical Density (OD); Pregnancy Specific Protein B (PSPB); Pregnancy –Associated Glycoprotein (PAG); Prepared Enhancer solution; TMB substrate; Stop solution; Ultrasonography; Rectal palpation; Artificial Insemination (AI).

Introduction

Early pregnancy diagnosis is critical for maximizing herd productivity in the cattle industry. Current methods for pregnancy diagnosis include: observation for return to estrus, rectal palpation, trans-rectal ultrasonography, and blood tests for specific antigens.

These blood tests include detection of Pregnancy-Associated Glycoproteins (PAGs) which belongs to a large family of aspartic peptidase of which Pregnancy-Specific Protein B (PSPB) was the first member to be discovered [1]. These glycoproteins are produced exclusively by specialized trophoblastic giant cells in ruminant placenta [2] , which migrates from trophectoderm to fuse with maternal uterine epithelial cells, and release their granular content ( containing PSPB and PAG ) into the maternal circulation [3]. The PAGs consist of several isoelectric and molecular protein variants that can be partially purified from other placental proteins. Antibodies made against the purified proteins can be used to detect the presence of these proteins in the peripheral circulation of cattle. Because these proteins are specific to the placental tissue, it is possible to use detection of PAGs in the maternal circulation as indicator of pregnancy [4].

Trans-rectal palpation, B-mode ultrasonography and measurement of blood PSPB and PAG concentration are commonly used for early pregnancy diagnosis. Serum PSPB and PAG concentrations increase progressively from 30 days of pregnancy, peak 1-5 days before calving and decline there after [5,6]. The first blood –based pregnancy- specific assay for ruminant was described by Sasser et al. on the basis of radioimmunoassay for PSPB [5,7]. Pregnancy associated glycoproteins such as PBSP B [8, 9] and other PAGs [6,10,11] have been used for early detection of pregnancy in dairy cattle, starting as early as 21 days after AI.

More recently, ELISA assays for PBSB [4] and PAG [10] became commercially available. The PSPB ELISA is available under the trade name BioPRYN and provides a qualitative pregnancy classification based on measurement of PBSB in serum of pregnant ruminants and has been commercially available since 2003 in USA and applied 25 days post breeding in heifers and 28 days in adult cows while PAGs was developed by IDEXX, USA.

BioPRYN (Bio Tracking) has recently manufactured Bio-RPD kits to be inspected visually with shorter incubations and utilized on-farm or in areas without access to laboratory equipment. Cattle can be tested 28 days post breeding or greater. The manufacture claimed that the sensitivity is (99.9%) and matches with BioPRYN-flex ELISA assay, but with visual interpretation and human subjectivity there were a small percentage (1.5%) of none pregnant animals that were identified as pregnant.

Therefore the objective of the present study was to evaluate and compare the results of Bio-RPD with BioPRYN flex ELISA assay as early pregnancy determination in dairy cattle.

Materials and Methods

The study was performed at Al Safi dairy farm Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia. 92 cows sera were used for both Bio-RPD and BioPRYN flex ELISA and the results obtained by both assays were compared.

Bio-RPD Visual test:

The test was performed as per BioPRYN instructions. 100 microliters of cow’s sera were added to the well of the plate. The standards were added after all the samples have been loaded in duplicates (Hi and low standards). Gently swirl and allow the plate for at least 10 minutes after the last standard is added. Then add 50 microliters of detector Buffer (#1) in the well with the samples and standards and gently swirl and incubate for 10 minutes at room temperature. Wash 4 times with water and then add 100 microliters of prepared Enhancer solution (#2) to all wells and incubate for 10 minutes. Wash 4 times with water and add 100 microliters of TMB substrate (#3) to all wells and incubate for 10 minutes at room temperature. Add 50 microliters of stop buffer (#4) to all well without removing TMB solution. Then visually read the results of the plate. Any sample above the Hi standard is considered pregnant and any samples below the low standard is considered not pregnant. Any sample between the Hi and Low standard is considered Recheck. This means the animal has a lower than expected level protein and should be rechecked in a week to determine the actual status.

BioPRYN Flex ELISA Assay:

BioPRYN Flex ELISA (Bio Tracking LLC, Moscow, ID, USA) was also used in the study and it was performed according to the instruction of the manufacture. It is provide a qualitative classification based on comparison of a sample optical density with three threshold optical density values (high, low and cut-off) calculated for each plate. The threshold values were calculated from the Optical Density (OD, wave length 450nm) values of duplicates test well for two PSPB (high and low). If the OD exceeded the high threshold the animal was categorized as pregnant. An OD less than threshold, was designated as not pregnant.

Result

Test results of 92 tested sera by Bio-RPD and BioPRYN Flex were illustrated in (Table 1, Table 2, Figure 1, Figure 2).

Figure 1: BioPRYN visual results.

Figure 2: BioPRYN ELISA results.

Unit Samples analyzed Pregnant Re-check Open False positive Total
BioPRYN ELISA Pregnancy 92 66 71.70% 0 0% 26 28.30% 0 0% 92
BioPRYN Visual Pregnancy 92 63 68.50% 3 3.30% 25 27.20% 1 1.10% 92

Table 1: Bovine serum BioPRYN ELISA and BioPRYN visual pregnancy results.

Sr. No. Date of Rep. ELISA results ELISA OD Visual results Remarks
1 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.858 Pregnant  
2 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.861 Pregnant  
3 21.09.2020 Open 0.124 Open  
4 21.09.2020 Open 0.084 Open  
5 21.09.2020 Open 0.109 Open  
6 21.09.2020 Pregnant 0.96 Re-check  
7 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.191 Pregnant  
8 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.249 Pregnant  
9 21.09.2020 Open 0.144 Open  
10 21.09.2020 Open 0.185 Open  
11 21.09.2020 Open 0.129 Open  
12 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.227 Pregnant  
13 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.961 Pregnant  
14 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.134 Pregnant  
15 21.09.2020 Open 0.116 Open  
16 21.09.2020 Open 0.107 Open  
17 21.09.2020 Open 0.156 Open  
18 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.954 Pregnant  
19 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.033 Pregnant  
20 21.09.2020 Open 0.267 Open  
21 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.383 Re-check  
22 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.85 Pregnant  
23 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.709 Pregnant  
24 21.09.2020 Open 0.106 Open  
25 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.366 Pregnant  
26 21.09.2020 Open 0.096 Open  
27 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.199 Pregnant  
28 21.09.2020 Open 0.112 Open  
29 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.549 Pregnant  
30 21.09.2020 Open 0.157 Open  
31 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.645 Pregnant  
32 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.994 Pregnant  
33 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.56 Pregnant  
34 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.712 Pregnant  
35 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.847 Pregnant  
36 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.781 Pregnant  
37 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.922 Pregnant  
38 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.201 Pregnant  
39 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.129 Pregnant  
40 21.09.2020 Open 0.114 Open  
41 21.09.2020 Open 0.119 Open  
42 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.247 Pregnant  
43 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.2 Pregnant  
44 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.389 Pregnant  
45 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.178 Pregnant  
46 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.196 Pregnant  
47 21.09.2020 Open 0.087 Open  
48 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.235 Pregnant  
49 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.173 Pregnant  
50 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.926 Pregnant  
51 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.988 Pregnant  
52 21.09.2020 Open 0.151 Open  
53 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.997 Pregnant  
54 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.882 Pregnant  
55 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.474 Pregnant  
56 21.09.2020 Open 0.135 Open  
57 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.323 Pregnant  
58 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.703 Pregnant  
59 21.09.2020 Open 0.093 Open  
60 21.09.2020 Open 0.109 Open  
61 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.129 Pregnant  
62 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.064 Pregnant  
63 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.422 Pregnant  
64 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.37 Pregnant  
65 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.551 Pregnant  
66 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.275 Pregnant  
67 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.371 Pregnant  
68 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.447 Pregnant  
69 21.09.2020 Open 0.098 Open  
70 21.09.2020 Open 0.116 Pregnant False positive
71 21.09.2020 Open 0.1 Open  
72 21.09.2020 Open 0.113 Open  
73 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.54 Pregnant  
74 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.034 Pregnant  
75 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.204 Pregnant  
76 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.548 Pregnant  
77 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.04 Pregnant  
78 21.09.2020 Pregnant 0.965 Re-check  
79 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.349 Pregnant  
80 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.498 Pregnant  
81 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.128 Pregnant  
82 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.929 Pregnant  
83 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.025 Pregnant  
84 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.106 Pregnant  
85 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.116 Pregnant  
86 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.92 Pregnant  
87 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.215 Pregnant  
88 21.09.2020 Open 0.174 Open  
89 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.05 Pregnant  
90 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.081 Pregnant  
91 21.09.2020 Pregnant 2.347 Pregnant  
92 21.09.2020 Pregnant 1.823 Pregnant  

Table 2: Pregnancy results.

The results showed animals defined as pregnant, recheck, not pregnant (open) and false positive. Out of 92 tested sera, 66 were categorized by BioPRYN Flex ELISA as pregnant (71.7%) and 63 were defined by Bio-RPD as pregnant (68, 5%).

Twenty six recorded as not pregnant (open) using BioPRYN Flex (28.3%) and Twenty five were categorized not pregnant using Bio- RPD (27.2%). Three samples were considered recheck by Bio-RPD as their color reading is between the Hi and Low standards.

With BioPRYN Flex none were defined false positive (0%) while with Bio-RPD 1 is diagnosed as false positive 1.1% as it is not pregnant (open) by BioPRYN Flex. The sensitivity of Bio-RPD is 99% when compared with BioPRYN Flex ELISA.

Discussion

Pregnancy-Specific Protein B (PSPB) was first detected in bovine placenta (Butler et al., 1982). Antibodies made against these purified proteins (PSPB) can be used to detect the presence of these proteins in the peripheral circulation of the cows. And because these proteins are specific to the placenta tissue, they become visible in the maternal blood and can be determined with high accurateness from 28 to 30 days post breeding as an indicator of pregnancy.

The rapid visual Bio-RPD and BioPRYN ELISA were used in this study to measure PBSB values in dairy cows under field condition and their results were compared together.

In our study, a higher accuracy and sensitivity of Bio-RPD were recorded (99%) when compared with BioPRYN ELISA. These results seemed consistent with those reported by the manufacture who claimed that the sensitivity is (99.9%) and matches with BioPRYNflex ELISA assay.

Any samples between the Hi and Low standards mean the animal has a lower than expected protein and should be rechecked in a week to determine the actual status. One limitation of the present study was the fact that 3 cow samples were recorded as recheck, and could not be used for determination of accuracy and sensitivity calculation because no chance for testing them again after one week to check the level of the protein.

In summary, the rapid Bio-RPD assay, based on visual inspection with shorter incubation for determine PSPB and utilized on farms without access to laboratory, had extremely high and similar sensitivity for early pregnancy diagnosis in dairy cows compared with PSPB ELISA.

Conclusion

Test results showed that the sensitivity of Bio-RPD visual test is 99% compared to BioPRYN Flex ELISA. Thus it is recommended to be utilized as rapid tool for pregnancy diagnosis on farms that have no laboratory equipment or transrectal ultrasonography.

References