European Journal of Experimental Biology Open Access

  • ISSN: 2248-9215
  • Journal h-index: 45
  • Journal CiteScore: 34.35
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Research Article - (2011) Volume 1, Issue 2

Biocontrol Measures of Pineapple Disease in Sugarcane

R. Mahalingam*, V. Ambikapathy and A. Panneerselvam

P. G and Research Dept. of Botany and Microbiology, A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous) Poondi, Thanjavur (Dt), Tamil Nadu, India

*Corresponding Author:
R. Mahalingam
P. G and Research Dept. of Botany and Microbiology
A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous) Poondi
Thanjavur (Dt), Tamil Nadu, India
Visit for more related articles at European Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The antagonistic potentiality of some soil fungi against Ceratocystis paradoxa (C.Moreau) a pathogen causing Pineapple disease in sugarcane was studied by dual culture method. The pathogen Ceratocystis paradoxa and some individual species of the soil fungi viz Aspergillus awamori, A. niger, Gliocladium virens, Penicillium citrinum, Trichothecium sp, Trichoderma glaucum, T. harzianum, T. hirsuta, T. koeningii and T. viride were grown on PDA medium individually. Three replicates for each set were maintained. The colony interactions between the pathogen and the soil fungi were assessed the following model proposed by porter (1924) and Diekinson and Broadman (1971). The results were observed and recorded.

Key Words

Antagonism, Ceratocystis paradoxa, Pineapple disease, Soil fungi.

Introduction

Biocontrol of plant pathogen involves the use of biological processes to reduce the inoculum density of pathogen and to maintain their soil population below the disease threshold level. This reduces crop losses while interfering minimally with the ecosystem and damaging the environment. The pathogen in the absence of their hosts survive either as dormant propagules or actively as saprophytes on dead organic substrates of the host in the soil. The survival structure of the pathogen in the soil are suppressed either due to natural suppressiveness of the soil or manipulation of the soil environment. The pathogen suppression in the soil is considered as an important step in the control of disease as it involves the direct disinfestations of the soil.

Cell free culture filtrates have been used to demonstrate the role of antibiosis in biological control (Khara and Hadwan, 1990; Tu, 1992; Naik and; Sen, 1992). In the present study, antagonistic activity of some soil fungi against C. paradoxa has been investigated in vitro dual culture and with cell free culture filtrates of fungi amended in medium.

The saprophytic growth and activity of the pathogen varies depending upon the environmental and soil condition. The differences in the saprophytic activities of variations in the cellulolysis rate of the organisms as suggested by Garrett, (1956). Though Garrett is pioneer in the studies on various aspects of saprophytic ability of the pathogen in soil, the conditions that inhibit the saprophytism of the pathogen may be exploited for biological control in several ways. The toxic metabolite produced by the initial fungal colonies of natural substrate may act to slow or present invasion by other species (Ambikapathy et al., 1994). Trichoderma sp. are most common fungal biological control agents that have been comprehensively researched and deployed throughout the world.

Materials and Methods

Dual culture experiments (Skidmore and Dickinson, 1976)

The sterilized potato dextrose agar medium was poured in to the petriplates and allowed to solidify. After solidification, colony interaction between the test pathogen C.paradoxa and the soil fungi were studied in vitro dual culture expermints. The test pathogen C.paradoxa and the soil fungi such as Aspergillus awamori, A.niger, Gliocladium virens, Penicillium citrinum, Trichoderma glaucum, T.harzianum, T.hirsuta, T. viride and Trichothecium, the fungal and plant pathogen were grown separately on PDA medium.

Then agar blocks cut from the actively growing margin of the individual species of plant fungi and test organism were inoculated just opposite to each other approximately 3cm apart on potato dextrose agar medium in petriplates. Three replicates for each set were maintained. Controls were set in single and dual inoculated culture of the fungus. The position of the colony margin disc was measured for every day.

Assessments were made when the fungi has achieved an equilibrium after which there was no further alteration in the growth. Since both of the organisms were mutually inhibited, the assessment was made for both organisms.

The percentage inhibition of growth was calculated as follows.

Percentage inhibition of growth = image

r = growth of the fungus was measured from the centre of the colony towards the centre of the plate in the absence of antagonistic fungus.

r1 = growth of the fungus was measured from the centre of the colony towards the antagonistic fungus.

The colony interaction between the test pathogen and the soil fungi were assessed following the model proposed by Porter (1924) and Dickison and Broadman (1971). Five type of interaction grade as proposed by Skidmore and Dickinson (1976) have been followed.

They are as follows

1. Mutual intermingling growth without any macroscopic sights of interaction – Grade - 1.

2. Mutual intermingling growth where the growth of the fungus is ceased, and being over grown by the opposed fungus - Grade - 2

3. Intermingling growth where the fungus under observation is growing into the opposed fungus either above (or) below - Grade - 3.

4. Sight inhibition of both the interacting fungi with narrow demarcation line (l-2mm) - Grade - 4

5. Mutual inhibition of growth at a distance of - 2mm - Grade - 5

Results and Discussion

Antibiotic interaction between soil Fungi and Ceratocystis paradoxa

The types of interaction of the pathogen with soil fungi were as follows.

T. koeningii - Grade - 1

Gliocladium virens, T. viride and T.hirsuta - Grade - 2

A.awamori and A.niger - Grade - 3

T.harzianum, T. glaucum and Trichothecium - Grade - 4

P.citrinum - Grade – 5

The maxium percentage inhibition of C.paradoxa with T. koeningii (75) followed by Gliocladium virens (73.8), T.viride (73.8), T.hirsuta (72.3), A. awamori(70), A. njger (69.2), T.harzianum (56.9), T.glaucum (53.8), Trichothecium (53.8) and P. citrinum (23.1) (Table 1), It is evident that the antibiotic production varies depending on the comprting organisms.

experimental-biology-dual-culture-experiments

Table 1. Colony interactions between C.paradoxa and some soil fungi in dual culture experiments

The mycelium of T.koeningii, Gliocladium virens and T.viride were found growing over the pathogen. The antagonistic properties of different species of Aspergillus, penicillium, Trichothecium and Trichoderma against different pathogens have also been reported (panneerselvam and sarsvanamuthu, 1994, 1996, 1999, Ambikapathy etal., 2000 ; Madhanraj et al, 2009; Muthukumar et al., 2006, Gomathi and Ambikapathy, 2011) Table 1

Prince and Prabakaran (2011) studied that the antifungal activity of eight different medicinal plants namely Aloe vera, Ocimum sanctum, Cenetella asiatica, Piper betle, Calotropis gigantea, Vitex negundo, Ocimum basilicum and Azadirachta indica were tested against plant pathogenic fungus (red rot disease causing agent) Colletotrichum falcatum. Among the different plant tested, all the three solvents of the Vitex negundo showed maximum antifungal activity against the plant pathogen tested.

Growth of C.paradoxa towards the centre of the plate in the absence of any antagonistic fungus (control) was 65mm. measurement was taken in to after 72 hours.

The staling products of the antagonistic fungi inhibited the growth of C.paradoxa 20% concentration. Antibiotic substances as staling growth products in liquid cultures has already been emphasized (Robinson, 1969 ; Fravel, 1988).

Differential sensitivity of the pathogen to the staling growth products of the fungi was also observed. This may be due to the genetic potentialities of the pathogen to tolerate a particular antibiotic substance and the chemical properties of the staling substances. It has also been reported that the environmental parameters, nutrients, also influences the antifungal activity of a pathogen.(Fravel, 1988).

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the secretary & correspondent for laboratory facilities of A.V.V.M Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous) Poondi -613 503 & Sri Gowri Biotech Research Academy, Thanjavur.

References