Journal of the Pancreas Open Access

  • ISSN: 1590-8577
  • Journal h-index: 80
  • Journal CiteScore: 29.12
  • Journal Impact Factor: 19.45*
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +44 7460731551

Abstract

Unresolved Issues about Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: An Overview

Pier Alberto Testoni

Pancreatitis represents the most common and feared complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Since the introduction of ERCP into clinical practice, many attempts have been made to identify the mechanisms and conditions that can place patients at risk of developing postprocedure pancreatitis, with conflicting and in most cases unsatisfactory results. The following questions about post-ERCP pancreatitis still remain unanswered: the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the onset of pancreatitis, procedural factors that can induce pancreatic damage, patient conditions that can increase the risk of developing pancreatitis in the post-procedure period, criteria for predicting the occurrence of pancreatitis, and possible methods of preventing the complication. Moreover, the criteria used to define post-ERCP pancreatitis differ in various studies and, consequently, there is a wide variation in the literature of the incidence of this complication and it is still not clear what its real incidence is. In the last six years, a significant advance in knowledge has been achieved in most of the above-mentioned fields. Four large prospective multicentre trials seemed to definitely identify patient- and techniquerelated risk factors that can place patients at risk of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis; clinical conditions, procedure- and patientrelated factors, and laboratory tests able to predict the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the early phase have been identified. An attempt to identify criteria for defining post-ERCP pancreatitis has also been carried out, although these proposed criteria have not been widely adopted by all Authors.