European Journal of Experimental Biology Open Access

  • ISSN: 2248-9215
  • Journal h-index: 45
  • Journal CiteScore: 34.35
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days
Reach us +32 25889658

Review Article - (2017) Volume 7, Issue 2

NOx is Best Compound to Reduce CO2

Shoichiro Ozaki*

The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wakoshi Saitama, Japan

Corresponding Author:

Shoichiro Ozaki
The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
2-1 Hirosawa, Wakoshi Saitama, Japan
Tel: +810467670991
E-mail: ozaki-0991@jcom.zaq.ne.jp

Received Date: March 08, 2017; Accepted Date: April 01, 2017; Published Date: April 10, 2017

Citation: Ozaki S. NOx is Best Compound to Reduce CO2. Eur Exp Biol. 2017, 7:12. doi:10.21767/2248-9215.100012

Copyright: © 2017 Ozaki S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at European Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The earth is warmed up by the burning of fossil fuel. If we can compensate the generation of CO2 and heart by CO2 assimilation, global warming can is protected. To promote CO2 assimilation, supply of nutrient N and P is most important. Nature has a system to provide NOx when materials are burned or by thunder. These NOx is critically important for plant growth. When fossil fuel burned, much NOx is produced. If we use all produced NOx, we can protect global warming. Large amount of N and P is contained in drainage. The drainage should be released as it is. Deep sea water contain much nutrient N and P. Shallow sea water contain very little nutrient N and P. Agitation of deep sea water with shallow sea water increase the plankton growth. These methods are effective methods to protect global warming and to increase food and wood productions.

Keywords

NOx; Carbon dioxide; Thunder; Carbon dioxide assimilation; Global warming

Introduction

The earth is warmed by the fossil fuel burning releasing CO2 and heat. The plant is growing by CO2 assimilation absorbing CO2 producing carbohydrate and O2. If we can compensate the generation of CO2 and heart with the absorption of CO2 and heart by CO2 assimilation, global warming can be protected [1-5].

Plankton photosynthesis is studied by many investigators [6-11]. It is estimated that between 50%-85% of the world's oxygen is produced via plankton CO2 assimilation [12,13]. The growth of plankton is dependent on nutrient N and P availability. Supply of nutrients is important factor for the plankton productivity [14-16]. When fossil fuel burned, much NOx is produced. If we use produced NOx as it is, we can fix CO2 and protect global warming.

In this paper I will describe the methods to protect global warming by increase of CO2 fixing by the increase of nutrients N and P [17].

NOx is a Gift from Nature

Nature has systems to change N2 to nutrient nitrogen. By thunder, the high temperature at fire place for cooking, warming up of room by burning of wood, by forest fire, by forest burning, by bonfire, and also burning of fossil fuel, following reactions proceed [18-20].

1/2 N2+1/2 O2 -------> NO-21.6 kcal

2 NO+O2 ----------> 2 NO2+13.5 kcal

3 CO2+H20 ----------> 2 HNO3+NO

NOx is a mixture of 90% NO and 10% NO2. NOx is dissolved in rain and give nutrient nitric acid and promote the growth of plant and plankton [21].

The earth was boon and plant appeared and plant eat CO2, H2O and nutrient N , P and plant is burned then NOx is produced to recover lost plant. When no burning material present, like sea district, thunder storms makes NOx [22-26]. NOx is a gift from nature. We should not go against nature. We should use NOx as it is. In 2010 fossil 1.4 × 1010 billion tons was burned and CO2 4.4 × 1010 billion tons and NOx 2.4 × 109 billion tons are produced. If we use all NOx for the fixing of CO2, we can fix 2.5 × 25 × 109=5 x 1010 billion tons CO2. As C/N ratio [66,67] of plant is around 5/1-50/1 (average 25/1) [27-30].

NOx is hated as pollution gas causing illness. Many governments set up very strict law to eliminate all NOx in burned gas and forced to eliminate NOx using ammonia. I wish to insist that NOx elimination should be stopped because toxicity of NOx is not so serious compared with significant merit of NOx. NOx is essential for plant to grow and produce food [31-33]. NOx is essential for the promotion of CO2 assimilation and essential for the production of foods for the promotion of health and long life for the protection of global warming [34,35].

Toxicity of NOx

No report as to the serious sick and dead person caused by NOx is reported.

NOx is released at no person district such as sea side far from house. NOx do not give serious damage to persons [36]. NOx is essential for the growth of plant and essential for the production of food and essential for all living biology. Therefore NOx elimination procedure and NOx elimination law should be eliminated [37-39].

Thunder Produce NOx, Yellowtail, Crab and Delicious Rice

Thunder produces NOx from N2 and O2. About 4 million thunders in one day and about 30 × 106 t NOx is produced by thunder in one year and about 20-80% of NOx is produced by thunder in the world [40-43].

At Japan sea coastal area, many snow falls occur. This district is highest snow fall district in the world and snow pile up to 2-3 m. At this district, thunder happen very often with snow. Ishikawa prefecture 42.4 day, Fukui prefecture 35.0 day, Niigata prefecture 34.8 day, Toyama prefecture 32.2 day, Akita prefecture 21.4 day in a year are top 5 prefectures in 47 prefectures in Japan. Thunder at winter time is different from thunder at summer time. Winter thunder run from earth to cloud and has several hundred times stronger energy than summer time thunder and happening day and night very frequently producing much NOx [44-46]. At the near sea, Gulf Toyama (Toyamawan) and surrounding sea are rich in nutrient N from thunder produced NOx and filled with plankton producing many Yellowtail (Buri) and Crab (Kani), therefore thunder is called as Buriokoshi (yellowtail producer) [47] .

These 5 prefectures produce very much delicious rice since thousand years when no synthetic fertilizer is produced. There are proverbs, many thunder year produce good harvest, one thunder lightning gives one inch growth of rice [48,49]. Thunder lightning is written as Inazuma (Rice wife). Kaminari (thunder) in Japanese character is written Ame (rain) on the top Ta (field). Most snow falling (3 meter) district Minami Uonuma is famous for the production of most delicious rice Minamiuonuma koshihikari [50,51].

On the contrary, at Setoinland sea (sea between Shikuku and Chugoku in Japan) district, especially middle part of Setoinland sea between Okayama and Kagawa Prefecture, thunder is very rare, once in 5 years [52]. Therefore no NOx is produced by thunder at this district. Fish industry of this district was destroyed almost completely since the supply of NOx was stopped by NOx elimination law [53]. These facts indicate that NOx is playing very important role for the protection of global warming and production of foods [54,55].

Methods to Reduce CO2

Paris agreement asks us to reduce CO2. To reduce CO2, we can do by reducing the emission of CO2 and by increase of CO2 fixing [56].

NOx elimination should be stopped

Large amount of NOx is produce when large amount of fossil fuel is burned. The amount of NOx produced is around 2.5 × 109 tons in whole world. To eliminate NOx 2.5 × 109 tons, equimolar ammonia 11.3 billion ton is used [57]. To make 11.3 billion tons ammonia, 2 billion tons hydrogen gas is used. To make 2 billion tons hydrogen, 6.4 billion tons butane is used. As a result, 17.6 billion tons CO2 is released. If NOx elimination is stopped, 17.6 billion tons CO2 release can be stopped. And 17.6 × 25=440 billion tons CO2 can be fixed [58,59].

Stopping of drainage treatment

Drainage contains nutrient N and P. To treat drainage, huge electrify is used. To make this electricity, 0.60 million fossil fuel are used in Japan. If we stop the drainage treatment, we can save the release of CO2 one million tons [60,61]. Each house need not to pay drainage treatment fee 20$ per month. Ocean, field and wood dumping of drainage are encouraged [62].

By stopping of drainage treatment and NOx elimination at burned gas, and by releasing of NOx 2 million tons and nutrient P 0.5 million tons, CO2 2 × 25=50 million tons can be fixed and fish 20 million tons can be produced in Japan [63-65]. By insufficient supply of nutrient N caused by NOx elimination law, fish industry suffered critical damage at Kuroshio (poor nutrient N, P) running sea especially at Seto inland sea district where no thunder and no supply of NOx by thunder. Tuna (maguro), Bonite (katsuo), Sardin (iwashi), Bream (tai), Mackerel (saba), Octopus (tako), Sea eel (anago), Oyster (kaki) decreased to 20%. Sea weed (nori) decreased to 0%. Many fisherman lost job [66-68]. Fish price increased five times and fish became much expensive than meat now. We Japanese can alive longest (Men 80.50 (third), women 86.63 (top)). The author studied the reason why Japanese can alive longest and found that Japanese eat fish as main protein source. Fish contain hyaluronic acid, glucosamine and chondroitin which are precursors of anti-aging reagents [84-90]. We Japanese may lose long life record from the fact that fish production was reduced remarkably by NOx elimination law [69,70].

Stopping of high temperature garbage incinerator

In Japan, special law about garbage incinerator was set up in 2002 by the reason NOx is not eliminated completely at lower temperature than 800. Operation of this incinerator requires excessive fuel and produce excessive CO2 [71-74]. If we burn garbage at lower temperature, we can save 0.3 million tons fuel and we can save the release of CO2 0.6 million tons [75]. And we can produce NOx 0.3 million tons and we can fix CO2 0.3 × 25=7.5 million tons. Each house need not pay garbage burning fee 20$ per month [76-78].

Extension of rice plantation area

In Japan rice production area was restricted to keep high price. No planted rice field is 1 million hector [79,80]. If we use full field, CO2 14 million tons can be fixed. And if we plant wheat at winter time at the same field as rice at summer time, CO2 30 million tons can be fixed [81,82].

Agitation of deep sea water and shallow sea water

70% of earth is covered by sea [83]. 70% of CO2 assimilation is carried out at sea. Sea contains enough N and P [84,85]. Plankton grow at cold sea because cold sea is rich in N, P. North Atlantic ocean and north Pacific ocean are plankton rich seas and produce much fish. Kuroshio current (running south east of Japan) is clean and contain very small amount of nutrient N and P, and produce small amount of plankton and fish. Oyashio current (running north of Japan) produce much plankton and much fish [86-88].

Current running west sides of United State, Canada and Chili are rich in nutrient N and P and rich in plankton and fish [89]. Concentration of N and P on the surface of sea at 100 m south of Muroto is 1 μg/l and 0.3 μg/l respectively. Concentration of 1000 m deep sea is N-3.3 μg/l, P-2.9 μg/l. Therefore agitation of deep sea water with shallow sea water is very important method to get high N, P concentration [90]. We must study to stir deep sea water with shallow sea water by wind or tide. Plankton production and Kaki (Oyster) production is already got success at Kumejima, Okinawa [91].

Summary

CO2 assimilation is most important for the protection of global warming and for the production of food and wood. NOx is plying most important role for the promotion of CO2 assimilation. NOx elimination should be stopped. Nutrient N and P in drainage must be used. If we use produced NOx as it is, we can fix CO2 and protect global warming.

References

  1. Shoichiro O (1993) Recycle of nitrogen and phosphorous for the increase of food production. New Food Industry 10: 33-39.
  2. Shoichiro O (2016) Methods to protect global warming. Adv Tech Biol Med 4: 181.
  3. Shoichiro O (2016) Methods to protect global warming, Food production increase way. New Food Industry 8: 47-52.
  4. Shoichiro O (2016) Global warming can be protected by promotion of CO2 assimilation using NOx. J Climatol Weather Forecasting 2016 4: 2.
  5. Shoichiro O (2016) Global warming can be protected by promotion of plankton CO2 assimilation. J Marine Sci Res Dev6: 213.
  6. Falkowski, Paul G (1994) The role of phytoplankton photosynthesis in global biogeochemical cycles (PDF). Photosynth Res 39: 235-258.
  7. Falkowski PG, Ziemann D, Kolber Z,Bienfang PK (1991) Nutrient pumping and phytoplankton response in a subtropical mesoscale eddy. Nature 352: 52-58.
  8. Falkowski PG, Wilson C (1992) Phytoplankton productivity in the NorthPacific ocean since 1900 and implications for absorption of anthropogenic CO2. Nature358: 741-743.
  9. Falkowski PG,Woodhead AD (1992) Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea. Plenum Press, New York.
  10. Chisholm SW, Falkowski PG, Cullen JJ (2001) Oceans. Dis-crediting ocean fertilization. Science 294: 309-310.
  11. Aumont O, Bopp L (2006) Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies. Global Biogeochemical 20: GB2017.
  12. No authors (2016) How much do oceans add toward oxygen?. Earth & Sky.
  13. Roach J(2016) Source of Half Earth's Oxygen Gets Little Credit. National Geographic News.
  14. Tappan H (1968) Primary production, isotopes, extinctions and the atmosphere. PalaeogeogrPalaeoclimatolPalaeoecol4: 187-210.
  15. Wang G, Wang X, Liu X, Li Q (2012) Diversity and biogeochemical function of planktonic fungi in the ocean. In: RaghukumarC (ed.), Biology of marine fungi. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  16. Emiliani C (1991) Planktic/Planktonic, Nektic/Nektonic, Benthic/Benthonic. J Paleont 65:329.
  17. Omori M, Ikeda T (1992) Methods in Marine Zooplankton Ecology. Malabar, USA: Krieger Publishing Company.
  18. Thurman HV (2007) Introductory Oceanography. Academic Internet Publishers.
  19. Ghosal R, Wray SM (2011) The Effects of Turbulence on Phytoplankton. Aerospace Technology Enterprise.
  20. No authors (2009) NASA Satellite Detects Red Glow to Map Global Ocean Plant Health. NASA.
  21. No authors (2005) Satellite Sees Ocean Plants Increase, Coasts Greening. NASA.
  22. Henson SA, Sarmiento JL, Dunne JP, Bopp L, Lima I, et al. (2010) Detection of anthropogenic climate change in satellite records of ocean chlorophyll and productivity. Biogeosciences 7: 621-640.
  23. Steinacher M,Joos F,Frölicher TL, Bopp L,Cadule P,et al. (2010) Projected 21st centurydecrease in marine productivity: a multi-model analysis. Biogeosciences 7: 979-1005.
  24. Richtel M (2007) Recruiting Plankton to Fight Global Warming. New York Times.
  25. CharlsonRJ, Lovelock JE,Andreae MO, Warren SG (1987) Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326: 655-661.
  26. Quinn PK, Bates TS (2011) The case against climate regulation via oceanic phytoplankton sulphur emissions. Nature 480: 51-56.
  27. Calbet A (2008) The trophic roles of microzooplankton in marine systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65: 325-331.
  28. Redfield, Alfred C (1934) On the Proportions of Organic Derivatives in Sea Water and their Relation to the Composition of Plankton. James Johnstone Memorial Volume. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.
  29. Arrigo KR (2005) Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437: 349-355.
  30. Kent AF (1989) Influence of atmospheric pollution on nutrient limitation in the ocean. Nature 339: 460-463.
  31. Sterner RW,Elser JJ (2002) Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology ofElements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press.
  32. Klausmeier CA,Litchman E, Levin SA (2004) Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation. LimnolOceanogr49: 1463-1470.
  33. Klausmeier CA,Litchman E,Daufresne T, Levin SA (2004) Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature 429: 171-174.
  34. Boyce DG, Lewis MR, Worm B (2010) Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature 466: 591-596.
  35. Schiermeier Q (2010) Ocean greenery under warming stress. Nature.
  36. Mackas DL (2011) Does blending of chlorophyll data bias temporal trend? Nature 472: E4-5.
  37. Rykaczewski RR, Dunne JP (2011) A measured look at ocean chlorophyll trends. Nature 472: E5-6.
  38. McQuatters-Gollop A, Philip CA, Martin E, Peter HB, Claudia C,et al. (2011) Is there a decline in marine phytoplankton? Nature 472: E6–7.
  39. Daniel GB, Michael D, Marlon RL, Boris W (2014) Estimating global chlorophyll changes over the past century. ProgOceanogr122: 163-173.
  40. David A (2005) Bridging ocean color observations of the 1980s and 2000s in search of long-term trends. J Geophys Res 110: 1-12.
  41. Watson WG, Margarita EC, Paul G, O'Reilly JE, Nancy WC (2003) Ocean primary production and climate: Global decadal changes. Geophys Res Lett30: 3-1.
  42. Watson WG, Margarita EC (2002) Decadal changes in global ocean chlorophyll. Geophys Res Lett29: 20-24.
  43. Dionysios ER (2005) Extending the SeaWiFS chlorophyll data set back 50 years in the northeast Atlantic. Geophys Res Lett 32: L06603.
  44. Michael JB, O’Malley RT, David AS, Charles RM, Jorge LS,et al. (2006) Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444: 752-755.
  45. Sarmiento JL, Slater R, Barber R, Bopp L,Doney SC,et al. (2004) Response of ocean ecosystems to climate warming. Global Biogeochemic Cycles.
  46. Georgina MM,Camilo M,Chih-Lin W, Audrey R, Teresa A, et al. (2013) Biotic and Human Vulnerability to Projected Changes in Ocean Biogeochemistry over the 21st Century. PLoS Biology 11: e1001682.
  47. Cermeño P, Dutkiewicz S, Harris RP, Follows M, Schofield O, et al. (2008) The role of nutricline depth in regulating the ocean carbon cycle. ProcNatlAcadSci U S A 105: 20344-20349.
  48. Peter MC, Richard AB, Chris DJ, Steven AS, Ian JT (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model.Nature 408: 184-187.
  49. Tracy JM, Athena CA (2016) Methanol Production by a Broad Phylogenetic Array of Marine Phytoplankton. PLOS ONE 11: e0150820.
  50. Georgina MM,Camilo M,Chih-Lin W, Audrey R, Teresa A, et al. (2013)Biotic and Human Vulnerability to Projected Changes in Ocean Biogeochemistry over the 21st Century. PLoS Biology 11: e1001682.
  51. Alfred CR (1934) On the Proportions of Organic Derivatives in Sea Water and their Relation to the Composition of Plankton. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.
  52. Arrigo KR (2005) Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature 437: 349-355.
  53. Taucher J, Oschlies A (2011) Can we predict the direction of marine primary production change under global warming? Geophysical Research Letters.
  54. Tokoro T, Hosokawa S, Miyoshi E, Tada K, Watanabe K (2014) Net uptake of atmospheric CO2014by coastal submerged aquatic vegetation. Global Change Biology 20: 1873-1884.
  55. Kuwae T, Kanda J, Kubo A, Nakajima F, Ogawa H, et al. (2016) Blue carbon in human-dominated estuarine and shallow coastal systems. Ambio 45: 290-301.
  56. Awaya, KodaniE, Tanaka K, Liu J, ZhuangD,et al. (2004) Estimation of the global net primary productivity using NOAA images and meteorological data: changes between 1988 and 1993. International J of Remote Sensory 25: 1597-1613.
  57. Cai WJ (2011) Estuarine and coastal ocean carbon paradox: CO2 sinks or sites of terrestrial carbon incineration? Annual Review of Marine Science 3: 123-145.
  58. Chambers JQ, Higuchi N, Tribuzy ES, Trumbore SE (2001) Carbon sink for a century. Nature 410: 429.
  59. Fourqurean JW, Duarte CM, Kennedy H, Marba N, Holmer M (2012) Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nature Geoscience 5: 505-509.
  60. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, et al. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756-760.
  61. Hartnett HE, Keil RG, Hedges JI, Devol AH (1998) Influence of oxygen exposure time on organic carbon preservation in continental margin sediments. Nature 391: 572–574.
  62. Raymond PA, Hartmann J, Lauerwald R, Sobek S, McDonald C, et al. (2013) Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503: 355-359.
  63. Regnier PAG, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Mackenzie FT, Gruber N, et al. (2013) Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nature Geoscience 6: 597-607.
  64. Taylor PG, Townsend AR (2010) Stoichiometric control of organic carbon–nitrate relationships from soils to the sea. Nature 464: 1178-1181.
  65. Watanabe A, Yamamoto T, Nadaoka K, Maeda Y, Miyajima T, et al. (2013) Spatiotemporal variations in CO2 flux in a fringing reef simulated using a novel carbonate system dynamics model. Coral Reefs 32: 239-254.
  66. ZHi-Liang Z (2009) Carbon and Nitrogen nutrient balance signling in plant. Plant Signaling & Behavior 4: 584-591.
  67. Coruzzi G, Bush DR (2001) Nitrogen and carbon nutrient and metabolite signaling in plants. Plant Physiol 125: 61-64.
  68. Boersma KF, Eskes HJ, Meijer EW, Kelder HM (2005) Estimates of lightning NOxproduction from GOME satellite observations Atmos. ChemPhys 5: 2311-2331.
  69. Allen DJ, Pickering KE (2002) Evaluation of lightning flash rate parameterizationsfor use in a global chemical transport model. J Geophys Res 107: 4711.
  70. Arino O, Melinotte JM (1999) The 1993 Africa fire map. Int J Remote Sens Environ 69: 253-263.
  71. Beirle S, Platt U, Wenig M, Wagner T (2003) Weekly cycle of NO2 by GOME measurements: a signature of anthropogenic sources. AtmosChemPhys 3: 2225-2232.
  72. Beirle S, Platt U, Wenig M, Wagner T (2004) NOx production by lightning estimated with GOME. Adv Space Res 34: 793-797.
  73. Boccippio DJ (2002) Lightning Scaling Relations Revisited. J AtmosSci 59: 1086-1104.
  74. Brunner DW, Velthoven P (1999) Evaluation of Parameterizations of the Lightning Production of Nitrogen Oxides in a Global CTM against Measurements. Eos Transactions.
  75. Choi Y, Wang Y, Zeng T, Martin RV, Kurosu TP (2005) Evidence of lightning NOx and convective trans- port of pollutants in satellite observations over North America, Geophys. Res Lett.
  76. Crutzen PJ (1970) The influence of nitrogen oxides on atmospheric ozone content. Q J R MeteorolSoc 97: 320-325.
  77. DeCaria AJ, Pickering KE, Stenchikov GL, Scala JR, Stith JL, et al. (2000) A cloud- scale model study of lightning-generated NOx in an individual thunderstorm during STERAO-A. J Geophys Res 11: 601-611.
  78. Fehr T, Holler H, Huntrieser H (2004) Model study on pro- duction and transport of lightning-produced NOx in a EU- LINEX supercell storm. J Geophys Res.
  79. Gallardo L, Cooray V (1996) Could cloud-to-cloud discharges be as effective as cloud-to-ground discharges in producing NOx? Tellus 48: 641-651.
  80. Hild L, Richter A, Rozanov V, Burrows JP (2002) Air mass facto calculations for GOME measurements of lightning-produced NO2. Adv Space Res 29: 1685-1690.
  81. Jourdain L, Hauglustaine DA (2001) The global distribution of lightning NOx simulated on-line in a general circulation model. PhysChem Earth 26: 585-591.
  82. Meijer EW, Velthoven PFJ, Thompson AM, Pfister L, Schlager H (2000) Model calculations of the impact of NOx from air tra?c, lightning, and surface emissions, compared with measurements. J Geophys Res 105: 3833-3850.
  83. Petersen WA, Rutledge SA (1998) On the relationship between cloud-to-ground lightning and convective rainfall. J Geophys Res 103: 14025-14040.
  84. Rahman M, Cooray V, Rakov VA, Uman MA, Liyanage P (2007) Measurements of NOx produced by rocket-triggered lightning. Geo Res Letters.
  85. Shoichiro O (2015) Sulfo disaccharides co-working with Klotho. Studies on structure, structure activity relation and function. World J of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences4: 152-175.
  86. Shoichiro O(2016) Secret of Anti-aging: Anti-Aging Food Containing Glucosamine,Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin. Jacobs Journal of Physiology 2: 13.
  87. Shoichiro O (2015) Glucosamine DerivativesSulfo disaccharides co-working with Klotho. J Nutr Food Sci 5: 416.
  88. Shoichiro O (2015) Synthesis of Anti-Aging Reagent: Sulfo Disaccharide Co-working with Anti-Aging Gene. Arch Medicine 7: 17.
  89. Shoichiro O (2015) Nutrition for Good Health,Anti-aging and Long Life, Hyaluronic Acid, Glucosamine and Chondroitin. MaternPaediatric Nutrition J 1:e102.
  90. Shoichiro O (2016) Food containing hyaluronic acid and chondroichin is essential for anti-aging. Inter J aging&Clin Res 16: 101.
  91. Shoichiro O (2016) Toward Anti-Aging and Long Life. Jakobs Journal of Physiology 2: 13-17.