Journal of Animal Sciences and Livestock Production Open Access

  • ISSN: 2577-0594
  • Journal h-index: 8
  • Journal CiteScore: 0.79
  • Journal Impact Factor: 1.57
  • Average acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
  • Average article processing time (30-45 days) Less than 5 volumes 30 days
    8 - 9 volumes 40 days
    10 and more volumes 45 days

Research Paper - (2018) Volume 2, Issue 1

Ensiling of Wet Rice Straw using Biogas Slurry and Molasses in Monsoon of Bangladesh

Lipi Rani Sarker*, Khan MRI and Rahman MM

Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh- 2202, Bangladesh

Corresponding Author:

Lipi Rani Sarker
Department of Animal Science
Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh
E-mail: biswaslipika95@gmail.com

Received Date: April 02, 2018; Accepted Date: May 15, 2018; Published Date: May 21, 2018

Citation: Sarker LR, Khan MRI, Rahman MM (2018) Ensiling of Wet Rice Straw using Biogas Slurry and Molasses in Monsoon of Bangladesh. Crit Care Obst&Gyne. Vol.2 No.1:2.

Copyright: © 2018 Sarker LR, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Animal Sciences and Livestock Production

Abstract

This paper presents an experiment of the preparation of ensilage with wet rice straw (WRS) treated with biogas slurry (BGS) and ensiled with molasses to increase the nutritional and preservation quality of straw in monsoon season of Bangladesh in the Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh. Chopped wet straw was preserved in plastic containers under airtight condition at room temperature based on the treatments as T0 (100% WRS only), T1 (0% BGS), T2(5% BGS), T3 (10% BGS) and T4 (15% BGS) with 5% molasses as DM basis in each treatment except T0 to investigate physical quality, chemical composition, in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) and metabolizable energy (ME) content at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 days. The highest CP content was found to be 7.70% in T4 and highest DM and EE content were found to be 31.42 and 4.86% in T0, respectively. The lowest CP and DM content were found to be 4.02 and 21.94% in T0, respectively and lowest EE content was found to be 3.13% in T4. The CP and DM were increased (P<0.05) and EE were decreased (P<0.05) with the increasing of ensiling time from 0 to 90 days. The highest OMD and ME content were found to be 48.46% and 6.98 MJ/Kg DM in T4 and the lowest OMD and ME content were found to be 34.31 and 4.84% in T0, respectively. The pH value was also decreased (P<0.05) with the increasing of BGS and ensiling time. Considering all the physical and chemical properties, among all the treatments, T2 and T3 are acceptable for preparing ensilage. Ensilage of WRS with biogas slurry will not only reduce waste disposal and pollution problem, but also provide inexpensive feed components for ruminants.

Keywords

Wet rice straw; Ensiling; Digestibility; Nutritive value; Metabolizable energy

Introduction

Livestock is a very important component of the economy of Bangladesh which contributes about 1.66% to GDP and 14.21% to agricultural sector [1]. But a large numbers of animals are suffering from shortage of feeds both in quality and quantity. The available roughage and concentrate for feeding livestock can meet only 50 and 10%, respectively of the requirement [2]. The livestock is beset with innumerable problems such as inadequate feed supply, under nourishment, high incidence of diseases, improper management in one side and poor genetic makeup on the other side. As in many countries in the world, pressure on the available land in Bangladesh is increasing rapidly, due to a high rate of population growth, industrialization and rapid urbanization. Because of scarcity of land for human food production it is not possible to spare land exclusively for the production of livestock feed. Available feeds are sometimes fed without consideration of their quality or the requirements of the animals.

Straw based feed is the main feed in the aspects of Bangladesh which constitutes about 87% of the total dry roughage and 72% of total roughage [3]. Rice straw is the vegetative part of the rice plant (Oryza sativa L.), cut at grain harvest or after. Rice straw is a versatile by-product of rice cultivation as it is used in many ways including fodder for livestock and even as a building material. Rice straw consists predominantly of cell walls, comprised of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Cellulase, hemicellulase and ligninase are required to break down these components [4]. Straw is highly fibrous residue having low protein (CP <3%) content which mostly indigestible. The poor digestibility of straw is further caused by the presence of high amount of inhibitory mineral element called silica. Silica, one element of the rice cell walls, can be present in high concentrations ranging from 5% to 15%, depending on the rice variety [5] and the availability of this mineral in the soil [6]. The digestibility of straw can be improved with the treatment of chemical or biological agents to loosen its lignocellulose bond. Several studies have reported the physical, chemical characterization and utilization of rice straw as ruminant feed [7,8].

Cattle population in Bangladesh is 23.44 million [9]. Cow dung production in the country is about 85.41 million ton per year [10,11]. Huge amount of cow dung are not properly used and these are the cause of environment pollution. Biogas production from cattle manure is an efficient way of utilizing cow dung that produces not only fuel but also slurry, an effective soil amendment. But, the byproduct from a biogas plant, bio-slurry is not using properly and most of the cases causing environmental and social hazard by discharging it in public places though it rich in nutrients especially protein (16-20% CP) and produced through beneficiary anaerobic microorganisms.

Biogas slurry can be used in animal feed with other feed ingredients having high palatability. During the fermentation process in the biogas digester there may be the production of microbial proteins, and several simple molecules in the usable form [12].

In Bangladesh, farmers usually store rice straw in heaps after sun drying. However, due to heavy rainfall (337 mm), and high humidity (86%), they cannot dry their straw during monsoon (July to August). As a result, about 8 million tons of straw dry matters (DM) are usually rotten [13]. About 20-30% of Boro paddy straw is spoiled during monsoon due to heavy rainfall, insufficient sunshine and scarcity of labor which causes feed scarcity of cattle and also environmental hazard.

Ensiling wet rice straw with biogas slurry and molasses will increase crude protein and other nutritive value of the diet lowering the pH value and produce lactic acid producing bacteria which will facilitate the natural preservation [14].

The aims of this study are to know the nutritive value of biogas slurry and wet rice straw and find out a convenient option of utilization of biogas slurry and wet rice straw. In addition, the optimum proportion of biogas slurry and wet rice straw for preparation of ensilage are determined and also minimize the environmental pollution.

Materials and Methods

Collection of experimental materials

Biogas slurry and wet rice straw was collected from Sheep and Goat farm, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh. Fresh biogas slurry was collected from biogas plant of Sheep and Goat farm. Enough care was taken during collection of the samples. Molasses and air tight plastic containers (30L size) were purchased from local market.

Preparation of ensilage

Ensilage was prepared in the Goat and Sheep farm, Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from 20th December to 25th March, 2017. Rice straw was collected just after harvesting. After collecting wet rice straw were chopped about 3-4 cm long by chopper. Then ensilage was prepared by mixing previously chopped fodder with fresh biogas slurry in varying ratios; 95: 0, 90: 5, 85: 10, 80: 15 and 5% molasses in each treatment. For proper mixing, biogas slurry and molasses were mixed first and then finally mixed with straw. When straw were properly mixed with biogas slurry and molasses, these were placed into air-tight plastic containers which were previously marked according to the treatment. Finally, plastic containers were kept in a room for 90 days for successful ensiling.

Chemical analysis

pH of ensilage was determined by digital pH meter after putting 2g sample in 50 ml distilled water. Dry matter was determined by drying the ensilage at 65°C for 48 h. Crude Protein (CP) was measured using Kjeldahl method while other proximate constituents, ether extract (EE), ash, crude fiber (CF) and nitrogen free extract (NFE) according to procedures described by AOAC (2004). In vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) and metabolizable energy (ME) content of ensilage were done following the method described by Menke et al. [15].

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed using SAS Statistical Discovery Software, NC, USA and differences among the treatment means were determined by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

Results and Discussion

Physical properties and pH of ensilage

The physical properties of the ensilage are shown in Table 1. All ensilages had pleasant aroma, desirable light brown color, soft texture and no mould growth was observed any of the ensilage, indicating optimum fermentation. A pleasing aroma and good color was obtained when poultry droppings were ensiled with maize forage [16], citrus pulp or weeds [17].

Chemical composition(g/100g DM) Ingredients
Biogas slurry Wet rice straw
Dry matter DM%(Fresh basis) 9.54 26.56
Organic matter (OM) 71.9 78.37
Crude Protein (CP) 14.4 3.01
Crude Fiber (CF) 21.27 31.56
Ether extract (EE) 1.23 4.43
Nitrogen free extract (NFE) 31.53 31.74
Ash 22.23 14.32

Table 1: Chemical composition of biogas slurry and wet rice straw.

The pH is shown in Figure 1 Significant differences (p<0.05) were observed among the treatments. After ensiling, the highest pH value was observed by treatment T0 followed by T1, T2, T3 and T4. It was observed that pH value decreased with the increase level of biogas slurry. The lower pH of ensilage indicates good fermentation quality which was due to presence of higher water soluble carbohydrates in fodder that enhanced lactic acid production [18]. Ensiled materials should reach a pH of less than 5 in order to destroy Salmonella and other pathogens [19]. In the present studies, pH values lower than 5 were attained in all ensilage.

animal-sciences-and-livestock-production-Changing-pattern

Figure 1: Changing pattern of pH values of different ensilage.

Chemical composition of ensilage

DM contents of different ensilages are presented in Table 2. It was observed that Dry Matter (DM) content (g/100g) of ensilage differ significantly (p<0.05). The highest DM was obtained in T0 followed by T1, T2, T3 and T4. The DM at different treatments T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4 were found 31.42, 30.72, 29.37, 28.65 and 27.69% respectively. The reason of decreasing the DM content in the study may be due to decomposition and fermentation. Losses of DM may come from run off, oxidation and loss of volatile organic compounds [20].

 Parameters Ensilage with  different percentage of biogas slurry
0% (control 1) 0% (control 2) 5% 10% 15%
Color Light Brown Light Brown Brown Brown Brown
Aroma Good Good Acceptable Molasses smell Pungent smell
Texture Hard Soft Soft Soft Very soft
Mould Absent Absent Absent Absent Absent

0% (control 1) = Only WRS, 0% (control 2) = WRS and 5% molasses, 5% = WRS+ 5% BGS+ 5% molasses, 10% = WRS+ 10% BGS+ 5% molasses, 15% = WRS+ 15% BGS+ 5% molasses

Table 2: Physical properties of ensilage at different levels of biogas slurry.

Crude protein composition of the silage was increased with increased proportion of BGS (Table 2). The highest (7.70%) CP content was found in T4 and the lowest (4.02%) CP content was found in T0. The CP content differ with the addition of biogas slurry (p<0.05). Maize stover ensiled broiler litter for 6 weeks and found that CP was increased with increased proportion of poultry litter [21]. The crude protein of sorghum forages ensiled with broiler litter increased with increased proportion of poultry litter [22,23]. Ensiled rice straw with poultry litter at different ratios and recorded the highest crude protein in ratio 50:50 [24].

Crude fiber composition of the silage was decreased with increased proportion of BGS (Table 2). The CF content of different treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4) of ensilage was 22.53, 21.13, 20.16, 20.17 and 20.09%, respectively. In the present experiment the value of CF was higher (22.53%) in controlled T0 than treated (T1, T2, T3 and T4) wet rice straw but the differences between T2, T3 and T4 were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The CF content was decreased from 22.53 to 20.09% with the addition of BGS (0 to 15%). When Kyasuwa hay (Pennisetum pedicellatum) ensiled with poultry litter, CF was decreased from 20.46% in treatment 80:20 to 15.95% in 50:50[25]. The reason of CF decrease may be due to addition of biogas slurry which contain lower CF than rice straw and also indicated the higher decomposition of wet rice straw ensiling with the addition of bio-slurry [26].

Ether extract components of ensilages were not significantly (p<0.05) different among the treatment groups (Table 2). The EE content of different treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4) of ensilage was 4.86, 4.55, 3.39, 3.35 and 3.13%, respectively. It was observed that EE was decreased with the addition of biogas slurry but the differences between T2, T3 and T4 were not statistically significant (p>0.05). The highest EE was obtained by treatment T0 followed by T1, T2, T3 and T4. It might be due to the lower EE content of biogas slurry and higher decomposition of wet rice straw. The result of this study is similar to [25] indicated that, when Kyasuwa hay (Pennisetum pedicellatum) ensiled with Poultry litter, EE declined with increased proportion of poultry litter.

The Ash content composition of the silage was decreased with increased proportion of BGS (Table 3). The Ash content of different treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4) of ensilage was 7.21, 6.37, 4.57, 4.36 and 3.96%, respectively. The Ash content was decreased significantly (p<0.05) with the increase of BGS. It might be due to utilization of ash for the microbial growth during the ensiling period. A linear increase in ash with increased proportion of broiler litter was observed [22,23]. The ash content of silage increases up to 28 days of ensiling [27].

DM basis T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 TTT4 60%
Dry matter (Fresh basis) 31.42a±0.51 30.72b±0.04 29.37c±0.04 28.65d±0.05 27.69e±0.04   37.34a ± .03
Crude protein 4.02e± .043 4.30d± .032 6.47c±.030 6.75b± .039 7.70a±.033   18.95a ± .12
Crude fibre 22.53a± .04 21.13b± .048 20.16c±.047 20.17c± 0.049 20.09c±.037   17.81d ± .02
Ether extract 4.86a ± .042 4.55b± .034 3.39c± .017 3.35c± .048 3.13c ± .023   3.05 ± .01
Ash 7.21a± .037 6.37b± .045 4.57c± .040 4.36d± .038 3.96e± .048   14.45a ± .03

*Means with different superscripts within row and column are significantly different (P<0.05)
T0=100% wet rice straw, T1= 5% molasses + 95% wet rice straw, T2 =5% BGS + 5% molasses + 90% wet rice straw, T3 = 10% BGS + 5% molasses + 85% wet rice straw, T4 =15% BGS + 5% molasses + 80% wet rice straw

Table 3: Chemical composition of wastage at different level of Biogas Slurry, Parameters (%) Wastelage with different percentage of Biogas Slurry.

In vitro organic matter digestibility of ensilage

The in vitro organic matter digestibility (OMD) differed significantly (p<0.05) due to different levels of BGS (Figure 2). The OMD content of different treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4) of ensilage was 34.31, 39.49, 40.29, 45.03 and 48.46%, respectively. It showed that the highest in vitro OMD was observed in T4 and the lowest was in T0. The increase in in vitro organic matter digestibility of rice straw ensiled with animal excreta and rumen digesta was observed [28].

animal-sciences-and-livestock-production-Biogas-Slurry

T0=100% WRS, T1= 5% molasses + 95% WRS, T2 =5% molasses + 5% BGS +90% WRS, T3 =5% molasses + 10% BGS + 85%WRS, T4 = 5% molasses + 15% BGS + 80% WRS. Bar represents mean ± SD. a,b,c,d, e values with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05) among treatments.
Figure 2: In vitro organic matter digestibility (%) of ensilage at different level of Biogas Slurry.

Metabolizable energy content of ensilage

Metabolizable energy content of ensilage is shown in Figure 3 The values for metabolizable energy (ME) content (MJ/Kg DM) of ensilage differed significantly (p<0.05) among the treatments. The ME content of different treatments (T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4) of ensilage was 4.84, 5.62, 5.74, 6.46 and 6.98%, respectively. The highest ME (6.98) was observed in T4 which was higher than that of T0, T1, T2, and T3 treatment. The lowest ME (4.84) was observed in control treatment (T0). Bostami et al. (2009) also reported that ME content was increased in treated ensiled maize stover than untreated ensiled maize stover [29]. Ensiling period has no significant (p>0.05) effect on ME content of silage [30,31].

animal-sciences-and-livestock-production-Metabolizable-Energy

T0=100% WRS, T1= 5% molasses + 95% WRS, T2 =5% molasses + 5% BGS +90% WRS, T3 =5% molasses + 10% BGS + 85%WRS, T4 = 5% molasses + 15% BGS + 80% WRS. Bar represents mean ± SD. a, b, c, d, e values with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05) among treatments.
Figure 3: Metabolizable Energy (MJ/kg DM) of ensilage at different level of biogas slurry.

Conclusion

The results suggest that ensiling wet rice straw with up to 10% biogas slurry and 5% molasses significantly improves the nutritional values of ensilage and may be a feasible means of preserving and converting slurry, in to a palatable and nutritious feed for cattle. In addition, ensilage of wet rice straw with biogas slurry as a feed ingredient will not only reduce waste disposal and pollution problem, but also provide inexpensive feed components for ruminants.

References

  1. Bangladesh Economic Survey: Finance Division, Ministry of Finance and planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2015.
  2. Haque QM, Amanullah SM, Islam MM (2007) Introduction of forage crops with the existing cropping system of different agro-ecological zones of Bangladesh and its impact analysis. Progress Report Anim Production Division BLRI.
  3. https://www.mof.gov.bd/
  4. Schiere JB, Ibrahim MN (1989) Feeding of urea-ammonia treated rice straw. A compilation of miscellaneous reports produced by the Straw Utilisation Project (Sri Lanka). Pudoc, Wageningen.
  5. Vadiveloo J (1992) Varietal differences in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw. J Agric Sci 119:27-33.
  6. Agbagla-Dohnani A, Noziere P, Gaillard-Martinie B, Puard M, Doreau M (2003) Effect of silica content on rice straw ruminal degradation. J Agric Sci 140: 183-192.
  7. Abou-El-Enin OH, Fadel JG, Mackill DJ (1999) Differences in chemical composition and fibre digestion of rice straw with, and without, anhydrous ammonia from 53 rice varieties. Anim Feed Sci Technol 79: 129-136.
  8. Vadiveloo J (2003) The effect of agronomic improvement and urea treatment on the nutritional value of Malaysian rice straw varieties. Anim Feed Sci Technol 108: 133-146.
  9. Department of Livestock Services: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries, Government of the people’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2014.
  10. AIS: Agricultural Information Service, 2014.
  11. BBS (2003) Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Year Book of Bangladesh, Dhaka Statistics Division, Ministry of planning, Government of Bangladesh.
  12. Sikka SS (2008) Effect of incorporating biogas slurry (BGS) on the growth performance and carcass traits of growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19.
  13. Chowdhury SA, Huque KS (1996) Study on the development of a technique for preserving straw under wet condition in Bangladesh. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 9: 91-99.
  14. Molasses P (2006) Farm use of molasses. Molasses as a silage preservative. Benefits of molasses. Internet Search.
  15. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, (1979) The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci 93: 217-222.
  16. Harmon BW, Fontenot JP, Webb KE (1975) Ensiled broiler litter and corn forage. I. Fermentation characteristics. J Anim Sci 40:144-155.
  17. Hadjipanayiotou M (1982) Laboratory evaluation of ensiled poultry litter. Animal Production 35: 157-161.
  18. Yunus M, Ohba N, Furuse M, Masuda Y (1992) Effects of adding urea and molasses on napier grass silage quality. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 13: 1542.
  19. Roothaert RL, Matthewman RW (1992) Poultry wastes as foods for ruminants and associated aspects of animal welfare. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci
  20. Kung Jr L (2010) Understanding the biology of silage preservation to maximize quality and protect the environment. In Proceedings, 2010 California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium and Corn/Cereal Silage Conference
  21. Daniels LB, Smith MJ, Stallcup OT, Rakes JM (1983) Nutritive value of ensiled broiler litter for cattle, 1983. Anim Feed Sci Technol 8: 19-24.
  22. Al-Rokayan SA, Naseer Z, Chaudhry SM (1988) Nutritional quality and digestibility of sorghum-broiler litter silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 75: 65-73
  23. Yunus M, Ohba N, Shimojo M, Furuse M (2000) Effects of Adding Urea and Molasses on Napier grass Silage Quality. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 13: 1542-1547.
  24. Flachowsky G, Hennig A (1990) Composition and digestibility of untreated and chemically treated animal excreta for ruminants. a review: Biological wastes 31: 17-36.
  25. Ngele MA, Adegbola TA, Bogoro SE (2006) Nutritive value of rice straw treated with poultry litter, In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of Nigerian Society for Animal Production. 12-15.
  26. Baba M, Uba T, Halim AR (2010) Nutritive value of Kyasuwa hay (Pennisetum pedicellatum) ensiled with poultry litter at varying proportions. Research Journal Animal Science 4: 117-120.
  27. Skultety M, Skultetyova N, Bencova E (1991) Effect of different proportions of dry maize straw on fodder beet silage quality. Pol’nohospodarstvo 37: 648-654.
  28. Kim YI, Oh YK, Park KK, Kwak WS (2014) Ensiling Characteristics and the In situ Nutrient Degradability of a By-product Feed-based Silage. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 27: 201-208.
  29. Reddy GK, Reddy MR (1989) Nutritive value of rice straw (Oryza sativa) ensiled with animal excreta and rumen digesta. Anim Feed Sci Technol 24: 69-81.
  30. Bostami AB, Khan RI, Rahman MM, Mondal A, Sarker NR, et al. (2009) Study on the effect of ensiling with or without urea on physical quality, chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of maize stover. J Agrofor Environ 3: 167-171.
  31. Cone JW, Van Gelder AH, Van Schooten HA, Groten JA (2008) Effects of chop length and ensiling period of forage maize on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 55: 155-66.